Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 1

From: Repeatability and reproducibility of various 4D Flow MRI postprocessing software programs in a multi-software and multi-vendor cross-over comparison study

Fig. 1

Screenshots of software A (SW-A): Caas (v5.01, Pie Medical, Maastricht, Netherlands), SW-B: cvi42 (v5.9.4, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Alberta, Calgary, Canada), SW-C: GTFlow (v3.1.13, Gyrotools, Zurich, Switzerland), and SW-D: MEVISFlow (v10.3, MEVIS Fraunhofer, Germany). Note that a white framed 3D visualization of the thoracic aorta is added to screenshots of software B and C in the right lower corner, since this would be displayed on a second screen. Note how the contours in SW-A, SW-C, and SW-D delineate the vessel wall of the ascending aorta. In contrast, the contour in SW-B deviates from the vessel wall as it was not possible to adjust the contour freely

Back to article page