Open Access

Effect of deferiprone or deferoxamine on right ventricular function in thalassemia major patients with myocardial iron overload

  • Gillian C Smith1, 2,
  • Francisco Alpendurada1,
  • John Paul Carpenter1, 2,
  • Mohammed H Alam1, 2,
  • Vasili Berdoukas3,
  • Markissia Karagiorga4,
  • Vasili Ladis4,
  • Antonio Piga5,
  • Athanassios Aessopos6,
  • Efstathios D Gotsis7,
  • Mark A Tanner8,
  • Mark A Westwood9,
  • Renzo Galanello10,
  • Michael Roughton11 and
  • Dudley J Pennell1, 2Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201113:34

DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-34

Received: 10 February 2011

Accepted: 6 July 2011

Published: 6 July 2011

Abstract

Background

Thalassaemia major (TM) patients need regular blood transfusions that lead to accumulation of iron and death from heart failure. Deferiprone has been reported to be superior to deferoxamine for the removal of cardiac iron and improvement in left ventricular (LV) function but little is known of their relative effects on the right ventricle (RV), which is being increasingly recognised as an important prognostic factor in cardiomyopathy. Therefore data from a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing these chelators was retrospectively analysed to assess the RV responses to these drugs.

Methods

In the RCT, 61 TM patients were randomised to receive either deferiprone or deferoxamine monotherapy, and CMR scans for T2* and cardiac function were obtained. Data were re-analysed for RV volumes and function at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months of treatment.

Results

From baseline to 12 months, deferiprone reduced RV end systolic volume (ESV) from 37.7 to 34.2 mL (p = 0.008), whilst RV ejection fraction (EF) increased from 69.6 to 72.2% (p = 0.001). This was associated with a 27% increase in T2* (p < 0.001) and 3.1% increase in LVEF (p < 0.001). By contrast, deferoxamine showed no change in RVESV (38.1 to 39.1 mL, p = 0.38), or RVEF (70.0 to 69.9%, p = 0.93) whereas the T2* increased by 13% (p < 0.001), but with no change in LVEF (0.32%; p = 0.66). Analysis of between drugs treatment effects, showed significant improvements favouring deferiprone with a mean effect on RVESV of -1.82 mL (p = 0.014) and 1.16% for RVEF (p = 0.009). Using regression analysis the improvement in RVEF at 12 months was shown to be greater in patients with lower baseline EF values (p < 0.001), with a significant difference in RVEF of 3.5% favouring deferiprone over deferoxamine (p = 0.012).

Conclusion

In this retrospective analysis of a prospective RCT, deferiprone monotherapy was superior to deferoxamine for improvement in RVEF and end-systolic volume. This improvement in the RV volumes and function may contribute to the improved cardiac outcomes seen with deferiprone.

Introduction

Blood transfusions are standard therapy for patients with β-thalassaemia major (TM) and prevent death in childhood, but although clinical status and short term survival improve, each unit of blood contains about 200-250 mg of iron which the body cannot eliminate, which leads to long term iron accumulation. Patients treated only with blood transfusions may die in the second and third decades of life from the complications of iron overload, in particular heart failure [1, 2]. Myocyte damage is related to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) formed as levels of labile iron rise, which cause oxidative damage to membranes and mitochondrial respiratory chain enzyme dysfunction [3, 4]. Chelation therapy can reduce tissue iron levels and the incidence of cardiac complications, but patients at risk need to be accurately profiled for appropriate treatment. The cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) relaxation parameter T2* is sensitive to storage tissue iron in haemosiderin because of the creation of field inhomogeneities by iron particles, and the clinical adoption of this technique is now widespread as a mainstay of cardiac iron overload assessment and treatment,[57] with important capability to predict future cardiac events,[8] and evidence of significant beneficial effects on cardiac mortality [9].

Deferoxamine was the first iron chelating agent for clinical use and became standard therapy in the 1970s. It is a large positively charged lipophobic molecule, is poorly absorbed by the digestive system and has a short plasma half life [10, 11]. It is therefore administered subcutaneously using a portable syringe system usually overnight typically 5 times per week. This therapy can be very problematic with poor compliance, and a number of factors result in long-term cardiac iron accumulation with its use [12]. The second clinical iron chelator was deferiprone, which is a much smaller neutrally charged lipophilic molecule which allows good gastrointestinal absorption and cellular access [10, 11]. The plasma half life is longer allowing oral administration with three doses per day. Direct comparison trials show that deferiprone has greater efficacy than deferoxamine for reducing myocardial iron loading and improving left ventricular (LV) systolic function [13, 14]. However, there is a paucity of data related to the effects of these chelators on the right ventricle (RV), which is known to be an important independent predictor of outcome in dilated cardiomyopathy,[15] and ischaemic heart disease [1618]. Recent papers have established the normal ranges for RV volumetric parameters for non-iron loaded TM patients and shown a significant relation between T2* and RV ejection fraction (RVEF), including a small percentage of patients with impaired RVEF but normal LVEF [19, 20]. In order to identify and compare the effects of deferiprone and deferoxamine, we reanalyzed the CMR images for the LA16 trial, which was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the 2 drugs [14]. Our hypothesis was that deferiprone would improve RV function more than deferoxamine.

Methods

The LA16 RCT consisted of 61 regularly transfused patients with TM from 4 centres in Greece and Italy [14]. All patients were previously treated with subcutaneous deferoxamine monotherapy. Inclusion criteria included a T2* between 8 and 20 ms and LVEF greater than 56% based on the lower normal limit for non-anaemic subjects from previously published data [21]. No patient had heart failure symptoms. Deferiprone was allocated to 29 patients (actual dose 92 mg/kg daily) whilst 32 patients were allocated to continue with deferoxamine therapy (dose of 43 mg/kg/day overnight for an average of 5.7 days per week). Written informed consent was obtained according to local ethics committee approval.

Iron loading and cardiac function was assessed using CMR. The T2* sequences were installed at the local CMR facilities, Athens (GE CVi) and Cagliari (GE Signa). The technique was validated by scanning phantoms of known T2* and testing intra-site reproducibility by scanning 5 patients twice at the local centre. The same patients were scanned at the reference site in London (Siemens Sonata) for inter-site reproducibility. A coefficient of variation (CV) ≤ 15% was defined as acceptable. Site inter-study variability was 2.4% for Cagliari and 3.5% for Athens. Comparison with the reference site yielded CVs of 1.6% and 9.7% respectively. Volumetric data were acquired using a steady state free precession sequence (FIESTA). A set of contiguous short axis cines were acquired to give complete coverage of both ventricles. Care was taken to place the basal slice parallel to the atrioventricular groove. Slice thickness was 8 mm with a spacing of 10 mm. No patient had a history of, and no CMR scan showed any features of pulmonary hypertension (normal pulmonary artery size, no right ventricular hypertrophy, no systolic septal flattening). Patients were scanned between 3 and 10 days post transfusion at baseline, 6 months and 12 months after entering the trial. T2* values and LV volumetric data were assessed previously using a CMR viewing and analysis software package CMRtools (Cardiovascular imaging solutions, London, UK) [14]. LV function was assessed in the RCT using an early version of the analysis package in which LV volumes are quantified manually using direct surface planimetry, and therefore for consistency we elected to use the same version of the software to analyze the RV thus eliminating the need for right sided valve tracking. Care was taken to include blood volume below the pulmonary valve. Basal regions with thin, non trabeculated muscle were considered atrial and were excluded. Papillary muscles were also excluded from the blood pool [22]. Although local blinding to the treatment arm was not possible due to the nature of drug administration (oral for deferiprone and subcutaneous for deferoxamine), all remote scan analysis performed at the core-lab in London was fully blinded to treatment. Study treatment was unblinded on completion of LV and T2* analysis. For the analysis of the RV volumetric data, all data sets were anonymized and analyzed in random order using the same analysis package by experienced operators blinded to treatment arm and LV response. To assess reproducibility, data-sets with an improvement in RVEF ≥ 5% at 12 months were reprocessed blindly.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were compared using a paired t-test. T2* values were log transformed and changes expressed as geometric mean with coefficient of variation. Between groups comparison of drug effects were assessed using a repeated measurement ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. To quantify reproducibility the coefficient of variance (CV) was calculated.

Results

Full data on the LA16 study have been published including the patient demographics,[14] but the important trial summary findings are repeated here. In the deferiprone group 27 patients completed the study; 2 patients withdrew due to adverse events (elevated hepatic enzymes, in one case probably due to cytomegalovirus). In the deferoxamine group, 29 patients completed; 1 patient withdrew secondary to a reduction in LV function and 2 for personal reasons. The patient groups were well matched at baseline for cardiac T2*, LV volumes and function and RV volumes and function (table 1). Baseline RVEF was within the normal reference range for thalassaemia patients,[19] except for one patient in the deferoxamine group (RVEF 1% below the normal range). Patient compliance was similar for both groups. Myocardial T2* improved by 18% at 6 months (p < 0.001) and 27% at 12 months (p < 0.001) in the deferiprone arm. The LVEF rose by 2.0% from 69.7% at baseline to 71.7% at 6 months (p < 0.001) and by 3.1% to 72.7 at 12 months (p < 0.001). With deferoxamine therapy, T2* improved by 9% at 6 months (p = 0.003) and by 13% at 12 months (p < 0.001) but LVEF was unchanged being 68.4% at baseline and 68.7 at 6 months (+0.52%, p = 0.42) and 68.5 at 12 months (+0.32%, p = 0.66).
Table 1

Baseline values for cardiac volume and function parameters.

 

Deferiprone

Deferoxamine

p

No. Patients randomized

28

32

 

Age

25.1 ± 3.8

26.6 ± 4.7

0.33

Male sex (%)

15 (52)

16 (50)

0.99

Weight (kg)

57.7 ± 7.9

60.6 ± 13.2

0.30

Cardiac parameters

   

Myocardial T2* (ms)

13.0 (32%)

13.3 (30%)

0.77

LVEDV (mL)

134 ± 32

132 ± 23

0.81

LVESV (mL)

43 ± 14

41 ± 13

0.51

LVEF (%)

69.7 ± 5.4

68.4 ± 4.9

0.34

RVEDV (mL)

122.5 ± 24.9

124.7 ± 27.7

0.75

RVESV (mL)

37.7 ± 11.7

38.1 ± 12.6

0.90

RVEF (%)

69.6 ± 5.2

70.0 ± 5.8

0.79

Biochemical markers

   

Liver iron concentration (μg/L)

6.16 ± 6.0

6.32 ± 5.8

0.92

Serum ferritin (μg/L)

1791 ± 1029

2795 ± 2441

0.039

Haematology

   

Transfusional iron (mL/kg/year)

152 ± 43.4

144 ± 44.4

0.53

Haemoglobin level (g/L)

105 ± 12.0

113 ± 11.9

0.023

Values are mean ± SD except for T2* where values are geometric mean with CV.

In the current analysis, the RV mean volumetric and T2* values are detailed in table 2. To summarise, in the deferiprone arm RV end-diastolic volume (EDV) was stable, RV end-systolic volume (ESV) decreased significantly from 37.7 to 34.2 mL at 12 months (p = 0.009); and RVEF increased from 69.6% to 72.2% (p = 0.001). For the patients on deferoxamine therapy, the changes in RV parameters from baseline to 12 months showed no significant difference. Analysis of between drugs treatment effects using a repeated measurement ANOVA (table 3) showed significant differences favouring deferiprone for the reduction of RV ESV (p = 0.009 at 12 months, Figure 1) and improvement in RVEF (p = 0.013 at 12 months, Figure 2). Non significant differences between drugs were found for RV EDV. With regression analysis, the change in RVEF was found to be inversely related to the baseline EF (p < 0.001) with a significant difference between drugs favouring deferiprone by a mean of 3.5% (95% CI 0.8 to 6.3%; p = 0.012). The reduction in RVESV over 12 months was also related to the baseline ESV value with borderline significance (p = 0.051), and there was a significant difference between drugs favouring deferiprone by a mean of 4.5 mL more than patients on deferoxamine (95% CI 1.2 to 7.8 mL; p = 0.009). Therefore the patients benefitting most from deferiprone treatment are those with the lower baseline values of RVEF. The CV for intra-observer study RVEF measurement was 2.4% at baseline and 2.0% at 12 months. There was no relation between change in RVEF and change in LVEF (r = 0.3, p = 0.9).
Table 2

RV volumetric parameters at baseline, 6 and 12 months (mean ± SD) in the 2 treatment arms.

  

Baseline

6 Months

12 Months

p

Deferiprone

     
 

T2*, ms

13.0 (32)

15.4 (38)

16.5 (38)

< 0.001

 

RVEDV, mL

122.5 ± 24.9

123.2 ± 26.0

121.3 ± 24.9

0.61

 

RVESV, mL

37.7 ± 11.7

35.9 ± 11.7

34.2 ± 11.3

0.009

 

RVSV, mL

84.7 ± 16.5

87.3 ± 16.5

87.1 ± 17.0

0.16

 

RVEF, %

69.6 ± 5.2

71.4 ± 4.7

72.2 ± 5.3

0.001

Deferoxamine

     
 

T2*, ms

13.3 (30)

14.4 (37)

15 (39)

<0.001

 

RVEDV, mL

124.7 ± 27.7

124.4 ± 26.2

128 ± 32.1

0.17

 

RVESV, mL

38.1 ± 12.6

37.2 ± 12.5

39.1 ± 13.0

0.38

 

RVSV, mL

86.7 ± 18.0

87.0 ± 15.5

88.9 ± 21.3

0.25

 

RVEF, %

70.0 ± 5.8

70.8 ± 5.2

69.9 ± 4.6

0.93

The T2* values show the geometric mean and CV. The p value reflects the change from baseline to 12 months.

Table 3

Between drug effect on RV volumetric parameters showing a significant difference in RV ESV and RVEF favouring deferiprone.

 

Treatment effect

 
 

Deferiprone-Deferoxamine

 
 

Mean

95% CI

p

EDV

-1.21

-4.44

2.03

0.47

ESV

-1.82

-3.27

-0.37

0.014

SV

0.64

-2.02

3.31

0.64

EF

1.16

0.30

2.01

0.008

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1532-429X-13-34/MediaObjects/12968_2011_Article_1996_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

The response in the 2 treatment arms for RVESV showed a significant improvement for patients treated with deferiprone, which was not seen with deferoxamine (12 month difference between drugs p = 0.014).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1532-429X-13-34/MediaObjects/12968_2011_Article_1996_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

The response in the 2 treatment arms for RVEF showed a significant improvement for patients treated with deferiprone, which was not seen with deferoxamine (12 month difference between drugs p = 0.008).

Discussion

RV volumetric and functional parameters have been difficult to measure using conventional imaging techniques due to the irregular geometry of the RV chamber, the size and quantity of the RV trabeculae, and the proximity of the RV to the chest wall which impairs echocardiographic assessment. CMR suffers less from these drawbacks because of its inherent 3D nature and high blood to myocardium contrast and is therefore considered to be the most accurate and reproducible technique for assessing RV volumes and EF [23, 24]. Attention to correct definition of the basal slice during acquisition and subsequent analysis is however pivotal. The improved confidence of measuring RV volumes and function from CMR and other techniques has assisted the understanding the importance of the RV in cardiac disease. RVEF is an important predictor of outcome in dilated cardiomyopathy, which is both independent of and incremental to LV EF [15]. The predictive value of RV function has also been shown in congenital heart disease,[2527] chronic systolic dysfunction,[28] and ischemic heart failure,[16, 17, 29, 30] with RVEF being shown to be an independent predictor of outcome [16, 17]. Accordingly, the effects of myocardial iron loading on RV function may be important in thalassaemia patients.

In the current study, we found a significant improvement in RVEF (increase) and RVESV (reduction) with deferiprone therapy. These improvements parallel the previously reported LV response [14]. There was no significant increase in RVEDV suggesting loading conditions did not play an important role. A flat RV response was seen in the deferoxamine group, which again mirrors LV behaviour. The between groups analysis showed superiority for deferiprone over deferoxamine for both the reduction in RVESV and the increase in RVEF. The magnitude of improvement in RVEF and reduction in RVESV were greater for patients with a higher ESV and lower EF at baseline. Interestingly neither LVEF nor RVEF improved significantly in the deferoxamine group despite the improvement in T2*. The cause for this difference in functional response is not fully understood, but the explanation may lie in the additional effects of deferiprone on restoring normal cardiac mitochondrial function,[31] possibly through effects on reducing reactive oxygen species [32].

There is little other data relating RV function changes with the iron chelators, but a recently published abstract relating to a longitudinal trial of the efficacy of deferasirox in myocardial siderosis,[33] showed a significant improvement in myocardial iron levels with an improvement in RVEF at 1 year, but no change in LV function at 1,[34] 2,[35] and 3 [36] years of follow up. The significance of this discrepancy between RV and LV response to deferasirox is not currently clear, though it is possible that the RV response is an early signal of myocardial iron clearance as LV compliance and filling pressure improves.

Limitations

Data acquisition for this study was originally designed to assess the change in T2* and LV functional parameters in response to therapy. Therefore no RV long axis images were obtained to construct 3-dimentional models for volumetric analysis, but the requirement for this was removed by using direct manual planimetry for quantitative analysis of RV volumes. Pulmonary arterial pressure was not systematically measured using echocardiography of the tricuspid regurgitant jet, but here was no CMR evidence of raised pulmonary artery pressure in our patients, and pulmonary hypertension is rare in well treated thalassaemia major [37]. Direct RV measurement of T2* would have been interesting in this population to compare with changes in RV volumes and function, however, it is challenging to measure T2* in the thin wall of the RV and this was not attempted in the randomized controlled trial.

Conclusions

This study has shown that RVESV decreased and RVEF improved with deferiprone monotherapy and this beneficial response was superior to deferoxamine. RV volumetric and function parameters have in the past been neglected when reporting the efficacy of iron chelators for myocardial iron overload, and may have independent prognostic importance, as they do in other cardiac conditions with impaired cardiac function.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements and Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes for Health Research Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit of Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College. The original randomized controlled trial (LA16) was sponsored by ApoPharma, but no company funding was received for this study in which the imaging data was reanalyzed.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
CMR Unit, Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
(2)
National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London
(3)
Division of Haematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital
(4)
Thalassaemia Unit, Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital, Thivon & Papadiamantopoulou
(5)
Division of Paediatrics and thalassaemia centre, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, S. Luigi Gonzaga Hospital
(6)
First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Athens Medical School, Laiko Hospital
(7)
Department of Magnetic Resonance, Institute Euromedica-Encephalos
(8)
Department of Cardiology, St Richard's Hospital, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust
(9)
Department of Cardiology, The London Chest Hospital
(10)
Department of Biomedical Science and Biotechnology, University of Cagliari, Ospedale Regionale per le Microcitemie. Via Edward Jenner
(11)
UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London

References

  1. Olivieri NF, Nathan DG, MacMillan JH, Wayne AS, Liu PP, McGee A, Martin M, Koren G, Cohen AR: Survival in medically treated patients with homozygous beta thalassaemia. N Engl J Med. 1994, 331: 574-8. 10.1056/NEJM199409013310903.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Modell B, Khan M, Darlison M: Survival in beta thalassaemia major in the UK: Data from the UK Thalassaemia Register. Lancet. 2000, 355: 2051-2. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02357-6.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Rachmilewitz EA, Weizer-Stern O, Adamsky K, Amariglio N, Rechavi G, Breda L, Rivella S, Cabantchik ZI: Role of iron in inducing oxidative stress in thalassemia: Can it be prevented by inhibition of absorption and by antioxidants?. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005, 1054: 118-23. 10.1196/annals.1345.014.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Breuer W, Hershko C, Cabantchik ZI: The importance of non-transferrin bound iron in disorders of iron metabolism. Transfus Sci. 2000, 3: 185-92.View Article
  5. Anderson LJ, Holden S, Davis B, Prescott E, Charrier CC, Bunce NH, Firmin DN, Wonke B, Porter J, Walker JM, Pennell DJ: Cardiovascular T2-star (T2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload. Eur Heart J. 2001, 22: 2171-9. 10.1053/euhj.2001.2822.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Wood JC, Otto-Duessel M, Aguilar M, Nick H, Nelson MD, Coates TD, Pollack H, Moats R: Cardiac iron determines cardiac T2*, T2, and T1 in the gerbil model of iron cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2005, 112: 535-43. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.504415.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  7. Cohen AR, Galanello R, Pennell DJ, Cunningham MJ, Vichinsky E: Thalassemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2004, 14-34.
  8. Kirk P, Roughton M, Porter JB, Walker JM, Tanner MA, Patel J, Wu D, Taylor J, Westwood MA, Anderson LJ, Pennell DJ: Cardiac T2* magnetic resonance for prediction of cardiac complications in thalassemia major. Circulation. 2009, 120: 1961-8. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.874487.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  9. Modell B, Khan M, Darlison M, Westwood MA, Ingram D, Pennell DJ: Improved survival of thalassaemia major in the UK and relation to T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008, 10: 42-10.1186/1532-429X-10-42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  10. Porter JB: Practical management of iron overload. Br J Haematol. 2001, 115: 239-52. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.03195.x.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Kushner JP, Porter JP, Olivieri NF: Secondary iron overload. Hematology. 2001, 47-61.
  12. Tanner MA, Galanello R, Dessi C, Westwood MA, Smith GC, Nair SV, Anderson LJ, Walker JM, Pennell DJ: Myocardial iron loading in patients with thalassemia major on deferoxamine chelation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006, 8: 543-7. 10.1080/10976640600698155.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Anderson LJ, Holden S, Davis B, Prescott E, Charrier CC, Bunce NH, Firmin DN, Wonke B, Porter J, Walker JM, Pennell DJ: Cardiovascular T2-star (T2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload. Eur Heart J. 2001, 22: 2171-9. 10.1053/euhj.2001.2822.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Pennell DJ, Berdoukas V, Karagiorga M, Ladis V, Piga A, Aessopos A, Gotsis ED, Tanner MA, Smith GC, Westwood MA, Wonke B, Galanello R: Randomized controlled trial of deferiprone or deferoxamine in beta-thalassemia major patients with asymptomatic myocardial siderosis. Blood. 2006, 107: 3738-44. 10.1182/blood-2005-07-2948.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Juillière Y, Barbier G, Feldmann L, Grentzinger A, Danchin N, Cherrier F: Additional predictive value of both left and right ventricular ejection fractions on long-term survival in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 1997, 18: 276-80.View ArticlePubMed
  16. de Groote P, Millaire A, Foucher-Hossein C, Nugue O, Marchandise X, Ducloux G, Lablanche JM: Right ventricular ejection fraction is an independent predictor of survival in patients with moderate heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998, 32: 948-54. 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00337-4.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Larose E, Ganz P, Reynolds HG, Dorbala S, Di Carli MF, Brown KA, Kwong RY: Right ventricular dysfunction assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predicts poor prognosis late after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 49: 855-62. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.056.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Miszalski-Jamka T, Klimeczek P, Tomala M, Krupiński M, Zawadowski G, Noelting J, Lada M, Sip K, Banyś R, Mazur W, Kereiakes DJ, Zmudka K, Pasowicz M: Extent of RV dysfunction and myocardial infarction assessed by CMR are independent outcome predictors early after STEMI treated with primary angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010, 12: 1237-46.View Article
  19. Carpenter JP, Alpendurada F, Deac M, Maceira A, Garbowski M, Kirk P, Walker JM, Porter JB, Shah F, Banya W, He T, Smith GC, Pennell DJ: Right ventricular volumes and function in thalassemia major patients in the absence of myocardial iron overload. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010, 12: 24-10.1186/1532-429X-12-24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  20. Alpendurada F, Carpenter JP, Deac M, Kirk P, Walker JM, Porter JB, Banya W, He T, Smith GC, Pennell DJ: Relation of myocardial T2* to right ventricular function in thalassaemia major. Eur Heart J. 2010, 31: 1648-54. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq106.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Lorenz CH, Walker ES, Morgan VL, Klein SS, Graham TP: Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 1999, 1: 7-21. 10.3109/10976649909080829.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, Francis JM, Robson MD, Neubauer SJ: Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005, 7: 775-82. 10.1080/10976640500295516.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Collins P, Klein HU, Pennell DJ: Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol. 2002, 90: 29-34. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02381-0.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Grothues F, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Smith GS, Klein HU, Pennell DJ: Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J. 2004, 147: 218-33. 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.005.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Roos-Hesselink JW, Meijboom FJ, Spitaels SE, van Domburg R, van Rijen EH, Utens EM, McGhie J, Bos E, Bogers AJ, Simoons ML: Decline in ventricular function and clinical condition after Mustard repair for transposition of the great arteries (a prospective study of 22-29 years). Eur Heart J. 2004, 25: 1264-70. 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.03.009.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Graham TP, Bernard YD, Mellen BG, Celermajer D, Baumgartner H, Cetta F, Connolly HM, Davidson WR, Dellborg M, Foster E, Gersony WM, Gessner IH, Hurwitz RA, Kaemmerer H, Kugler JD, Murphy DJ, Noonan JA, Morris C, Perloff JK, Sanders SP, Sutherland JL: Long-term outcome in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000, 36: 255-61. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00682-3.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Gatzoulis MA, Clark AL, Cullen S, Newman CG, Redington AN: Right ventricular diastolic function 15 to 35 years after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Restrictive physiology predicts superior exercise performance. Circulation. 1995, 91: 1775-81.View ArticlePubMed
  28. Meyer P, Filippatos GS, Ahmed MI, Iskandrian AE, Bittner V, Gilbert J, Perry GJ, White M, Aban IB, Mujib M, Dell'Italia LJ, Ahmed A: Effects of right ventricular ejection fraction on outcomes in chronic systolic heart failure. Circulation. 2010, 121: 252-8. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.887570.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  29. Di Salvo TG, Mathier M, Semigran MJ, Dec GW: Preserved right ventricular ejection fraction predicts exercise capacity and survival in advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995, 25: 1143-53. 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00511-N.View ArticlePubMed
  30. Ghio S, Gavazzi A, Campana C, Inserra C, Klersy C, Sebastiani R, Arbustini E, Recusani F, Tavazzi L: Independent and additive prognostic value of right ventricular systolic function and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001, 37: 183-8. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01102-5.View ArticlePubMed
  31. Kakhlon O, Manning H, Breuer W, Melamed-Book N, Lu C, Cortopassi G, Munnich A, Cabantchik ZI: Cell functions impaired by frataxin deficiency are restored by drug-mediated iron relocation. Blood. 2008, 112: 5219-27. 10.1182/blood-2008-06-161919.View ArticlePubMed
  32. Kontoghiorghes GJ, Efstathiou A, Kleanthous M, Michaelides Y, Kolnagou A: Risk/benefit assessment, advantages over other drugs and targeting methods in the use of deferiprone as a pharmaceutical antioxidant in iron loading and non iron loading conditions. Hemoglobin. 2009, 33: 386-97. 10.3109/03630260903217141.View ArticlePubMed
  33. Smith G, Pennell DJ, Porter JB, Cappellini MD, Chan LL, El-Beshlawy A, Aydinok Y, Ibrahim H, Li CK, Viprakasit V, Elalfy M, Kattamis A, Habr D, Domokos G, Hmissi A, Taher A: Improvement in right ventricular function following 1 year of deferasirox therapy in patients with β-thalassemia. Blood. 2009, 114: abstract 5106-
  34. Pennell DJ, Porter JB, Cappellini MD, El-Beshlawy A, Chan LL, Aydinok Y, Elalfy MS, Sutcharitchan P, Li CK, Ibrahim H, Viprakasit V, Kattamis A, Smith G, Habr D, Domokos G, Roubert B, Taher A: Efficacy of deferasirox in reducing and preventing cardiac iron overload in beta-thalassemia. Blood. 2010, 115: 2364-71. 10.1182/blood-2009-04-217455.View ArticlePubMed
  35. Pennell DJ, Porter JB, Cappellini MD, Chan LL, El-Beshlawy A, Aydinok Y, Ibrahim H, Li CK, Viprakasit V, Elalfy MS, Kattamis A, Smith G, Habr D, Domokos G, Roubert B, Taher A: Continued improvement in myocardial T2* over 2 years of deferasirox therapy in beta-thalassemia major patients with cardiac iron overload. Haematologica. 2011, 96: 48-54. 10.3324/haematol.2010.031468.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  36. Pennell DJ, Porter JB, Cappellini MD, Chan LL, El-Beshlawy A, Aydinok Y, Ibrahim H, Li CK, Viprakasit V, Elalfy MS, Kattamis A, Smith G, Habr D, Domokos G, Roubert B, Taher A: Continued improvement and normalization of myocardial T2* in patients with β thalassemia major treated with Deferasirox (Exjade®) for up to 3 years. Blood. 2010, 116: abstract 4276-
  37. Aessopos A, Farmakis D, Hatziliami A, Fragodimitri C, Karabatsos F, Joussef J, Mitilineou E, Diamanti-Kandaraki E, Meletis J, Karagiorga M: Cardiac status in well treated patients with thalassemia major. Eur J Haematol. 2004, 73: 359-66. 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2004.00304.x.View ArticlePubMed

Copyright

© Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.