Table 3 Comparison of 2D reference against 3D 7× k-t SENSE and 3D 10× k-t SENSE images (n = 6).
LV EDV (ml) | LV ESV (ml) | LV mass (g) | LVEF (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2D mean ± SD | 145.8 ± 25.9 | 63.3 ± 19.1 | 95.4 ± 18.1 | 57.2 ± 5.9 |
3D 7× k-t mean ± SD | 138.3 ± 26.2 | 62.3 ± 20.5 | 90.9 ± 18.6 | 60.9 ± 10.7 |
Bias (95% C.I.) | 7.4 (-14.6; 29.4) | 1.1 (-12.8; 14.9) | 4.4 (-14.4; 23.3) | -3.7 (-26.7; 19.4) |
Lin's coefficient (95% C.I.) | 0.87 (0.64–1.00) | 0.96 (0.88–1.00) | 0.84 (0.56–1.00) | 0.88 (0.67–1.00) |
3D 10× k-t mean ± SD | 134.3 ± 25.8 | 63.9 ± 22.0 | 92.7 ± 17.2 | 53.7 ± 8.0 |
Bias (95% C.I.) | 11.5 (-16.1; 39.0) | -0.6 (-20.1; 18.9) | 2.7 (-13.5; 18.9) | 3.6 (-1.7; 8.8) |
Lin's coefficient (95% C.I.) | 0.77 (0.41–1.00) | 0.89 (0.69–1.00) | 0.88 (0.67–1.00) | 0.81 (0.58–1.00) |