Skip to main content

Table 1 Methodological variance in LV volumetric and functional parameters

From: 2030 Established cmr methods for left ventricular quantification differ based on variable exclusion of papillary/trabecular volumes: increased diagnostic impact among patients with left ventricular hypertrophy

 

Normal

p

Eccentric LVH

p

Concentric LVH

p

Myocardial Mass Index (g/m2) (method 1)

52.4 ± 8.9

 

134.6 ± 29.7

 

123.6 ± 17.7

 

Myocardial Mass Index (g/m2) (method 2)

49.4 ± 9.0

 

113.7 ± 26.0

 

111.6 ± 15.2

 

Δ Myocardial Mass Index (g/m2)

3.1 ± 0.7

< 0.001

20.9 ± 8.9

< 0.001

12.0 ± 4.3

< 0.001

Ejection Fraction (%) (method 1)

68.2 ± 6.4

 

21.8 ± 9.2

 

59.8 ± 15.1

 

Ejection Fraction (%) (method 2)

64.8 ± 6.2

 

19.4 ± 8.4

 

52.7 ± 13.4

 

Δ Ejection Fraction (%)

3.4 ± 1.0

< 0.001

2.4 ± 1.3

< 0.001

7.1 ± 13.4

< 0.001

End Diastolic Volume (cc) (method 1)

134.8 ± 39.9

 

282.5 ± 60.1

 

137.9 ± 27.8

 

End Diastolic Volume (cc) (method 2)

140.4 ± 40.6

 

320.5 ± 70.6

 

160.1 ± 27.8

 

Δ End Diastolic Volume (cc)

5.6 ± 1.7

< 0.001

37.9 ± 17.3

< 0.001

22.2 ± 7.4

< 0.001