Skip to main content

Table 2 CMR characteristics in the study population

From: Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in aortic valve disease: evaluation of ECG criteria by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

 

CTRL

Patients

  

All

Normal LV geometry

Concentric Remodeling

Concentric LVH

Eccentric LVH

N (%)

30

120 (100)

10 (8)

8 (7)

59 (49)

43 (36)

Predominant AS (%)

-

87 (100)

10 (12)

8 (9)

53 (61)

16 (18)

Predominant AR (%)

-

33 (100)

0 (0)

0 (0)

9 (27)

24 (73)

EF (%)

57 ± 6

57 ± 15

55 ± 18

69 ± 9

60 ± 14

50 ± 15*

LVM (g)

97 ± 26

199 ± 72§

120 ± 27

120 ± 22

224 ± 77

199 ± 54

LVEDV (ml)

133 ± 24

168 ± 74§

131 ± 51

81 ± 13

144 ± 51

226 ± 72*

LVMI (g/m2)

51 ± 10

104 ± 33§

64 ± 11

64 ± 5

114 ± 34

106 ± 26

LVEDVI (ml/m2)

72 ± 10

88 ± 38§

69 ± 21

44 ± 7

73 ± 23

120 ± 37*

M/V ratio (g/ml)

0.76 ± 0.18

1.30 ± 0.45§

0.95 ± 0.16

1.48 ± 0.31

1.61 ± 0.38

0.92 ± 0.19*

  1. Data are presented as mean ± SD. AS, aortic stenosis; AR, aortic regurgitation; EF, ejection fraction; LVM, left ventricular mass; LVEDV, left ventricular enddiastolic volume; LVMI, left ventricular mass index; LVEDVI, left ventricular enddiastolic volume index; M/V, mass-volume ratio LVM/LVEDV; §, p < 0.05 all patients versus CTRL; *, p < 0.05 concentric LVH versus eccentric LVH.