- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Is short-axis imaging of the LV obligatorily the most accurate method for non-invasive quantitation of the mass of the heart?
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance volume 11, Article number: P255 (2009)
Non-invasive LV mass quantitation is an important clinical metric with considerable ramifications that include substantial morbidity and mortality. Cardiovascular MRI (CMR) has been demonstrated to be the 'gold standard' for the quantification of LV mass for almost two decades chiefly defined by its high spatial resolution affording very low variability. Over the last two decades the technique has evolved typically, into contiguous, 2D short-axis (SA) orientations as the standard for CMR cardiac mass quantitation, believed to be inherently most accurate. However, as compared to other techniques wherein accuracy suffers from inability to define endocardial/epicardial borders, any inaccuracy CMR suffers is now predominantly governed by the basal-plane acquisition whereupon exact discrimination of the AV-valve plane is arduous.
We hypothesized that a systematic interrogation of alternative, non-SA imaging geometric acquisitions might now be more accurate for defining, despite lack of truly contiguous imaging, more accurate and reproducible LV mass measurements.
An agar-based gel phantom was created representative of the varied cardiac anatomy, complete with tapered apex, non-planar base, trabeculations and often asymmetrical geometry. The weight of the phantom was measured on a high-performance scale. The phantom was scanned under varied orientations: 2D short-axis, 2D long-axis, 2D radial long-axis, and 3D short-axis imaging. For each orientation, slice thicknesses of 5 mm2 and 10 mm2 were used, while the 3D scan used 1 mm3 and 2 mm3 thicknesses. All variations of the parameters were scanned using both steady-state free precession (SSFP) and gradient recalled-echo (GRE). Statistical analyses via Students t test were performed to determine variances of the mass of the agar.
The calculated mass of the agar based on the short-axis orientation was an average of 121% of the true LV mass. The long-axis orientation gave an average of 95% of the true mass. The radial scan gave an average of 96% of the true mass. The 3D scan (1 or 2 mm slice thickness) gave an average of 98% of the true mass. Larger slice thickness caused a significant overestimation of mass in only the 2D long axis orientation. No significant difference existed between the SSFP and GRE scan sequences in this (static) phantom model.
By default, 3D imaging via a phantom model designed specifically to emulate the natural heterogeneity of the typical LV is inherently the most accurate, especially via thin slice imaging for quantitation of LV mass. However, scan times limit clinical practicality for optimal accuracy. Contrary to the classical thinking that has evolved over the last 2 decades, the radial long-axis orientation shows great promise, as it avoids basal-plane errors associated with the short-axis orientation and has shorter scan times. Incorporation of this strategy inherently overcomes such basal-plane registration errors which exert a much greater influence over accuracy than do contiguous slice and interpolation errors. Future validation of this proof of concept study will include ex-vivo human heart studies.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Farber, N., Doyle, M., Williams, R.B. et al. Is short-axis imaging of the LV obligatorily the most accurate method for non-invasive quantitation of the mass of the heart?. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11 (Suppl 1), P255 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-S1-P255
- True Mass
- Phantom Model
- Asymmetrical Geometry
- Contiguous Imaging
- Thin Slice Imaging