From: In vivo comparison of DENSE and CSPAMM for cardiac motion analysis
time to peak circ. shortening [% of average] | time to peak rotation [% of average] | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DENSE vs. | 95% | -95% | bias | stdev | 95% | -95% | bias | stdev |
peak combination HARP | 18.65 | -22.84 | -2.10 | 10.58 | 42.15 | -47.36 | -2.60 | 22.83 |
demodulated peak combination HARP | 9.75 | -9.16 | 0.30 | 4.82 | 31.10 | -33.69 | -1.30 | 16.53 |
single peak HARP | 9.63 | -9.99 | -0.18 | 5.00 | 30.89 | -30.91 | -0.01 | 15.77 |
circ. shortening [% of average] | rotation [% of average] | |||||||
DENSE vs. | 95% | -95% | bias | stdev | 95% | -95% | bias | stdev |
peak combination HARP | 45.18 | -47.23 | -1.03 | 23.57 | 50.44 | -77.07 | -13.31 | 32.53 |
demodulated peak combination HARP | 35.29 | -44.54 | -4.62 | 20.36 | 84.44 | -110.45 | -13.00 | 49.72 |
single peak HARP | 41.73 | -38.81 | 1.46 | 20.55 | 62.82 | -59.60 | 1.61 | 31.23 |