Skip to main content
Figure 2 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Figure 2

From: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the myocardium at risk in acute reperfused myocardial infarction: comparison of T2-weighted imaging versus the circumferential endocardial extent of late gadolinium enhancement with transmural projection

Figure 2

Myocardium at risk by T2-weighted imaging and by endocardial extent of infarction. A) MaR by endocardial extent of infarction versus T2-weighted imaging. Solid line = line of identity; dashed line = regression line; r2 = 0.17, p = 0.002. The two patients with an aborted infarction and the two patients with more than 90% myocardial salvage are encircled. B) Bland-Altman graph showing the difference between myocardium at risk quantified by endocardial extent of infarction versus T2-weighted imaging. The difference between endocardial extent of infarction and T2-weighted imaging was -11 ± 12%. Solid line = mean of endocardial extent of infarction - T2-weighted imaging; dashed lines = ± 2 SD. The two patients with an aborted infarction and the two patients with more than 90% myocardial salvage are encircled.

Back to article page