Table 2 Pooled summary results
Studies | N studies | N | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive Likelihood ratio | Negative likelihood ratio | Diagnostic odds ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Per Patient analysis (all) | 26 | 2125 Patients | 89% (88-91) | 80% (78-83) | 4.18 (3.31-5.27) | 0.15 (0.11-0.20) | 33.65 (22.09-51.27) |
Adenosine stressor | 20 | 1658 Patients | 90% (88-92) | 81% (78-84) | 4.47 (3.39-5.88) | 0.14 (0.11-0.18) | 37.17 (25.16-54.91) |
Dipyridamole stressor | 5 | 417 Patients | 86% (80-90) | 77% (71-82) | 2.97 (2.16-4.09) | 0.20 (0.09-0.45) | 17.03 (5.56 - 52.18) |
Visual assessment | 20 | 1624 Patients | 91% (89-93) | 79% (76-83) | 4.08 (3.15-5.29) | 0.13 (0.10-0.17) | 36.79 (23.90-56.63) |
Semi-quant. assessment | 6 | 501 Patients | 82%(77-87) | 82% (77-86) | 4.88 (2.62-9.09) | 0.22 (0.13-0.37) | 25.44 (8.90-72.70) |
Per Territory analysis | 17 | 2709 Territories | 82% (79-84) | 84% (82-85) | 4.90(3.66-6.55) | 0.23 (0.20-0.27) | 23.23 (18.33-29.45) |
Per Artery analysis | |||||||
LAD | 8 | 662 Arteries | 83%(78-88) | 83%(79-86) | 4.37(2.96-6.44) | 0.22 (0.16-0.31) | 21.42 (10.94-41.94) |
CX | 8 | 672 Arteries | 76%(70-82) | 87%(84-90) | 5.74(3.94-8.35) | 0.30 (0.23-0.38) | 22.25 (14.09-35.10) |
RCA | 8 | 657 Arteries | 78%(71-84) | 87% (83-90) | 5.58 (3.74-8.32) | 0.29 (0.21-0.38) | 23.07 (14.55-36.57) |