Skip to main content

Table 2 Aortic dilation and aortic growth in Turner syndrome

From: Dilation of the ascending aorta in Turner syndrome - a prospective cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

 

Aortic dilation a

Aortic diameter and growth

 

Turner syndrome

Controls

Turner syndrome

   

Baseline

Change

Change rateb

 

n = 80

n = 67

n = 80

n = 80

n = 80

n = 80

 

%

%

mm

mm

mm/year

mm/year/m2

Aortic sinus

18.9*

1.5

29.2 ± 3.9

1.0 ± 1.9**

0.38 ± 0.7

0.26 ± 0.5

Sinotubular junction

30.3*

2.9

25.3 ± 4.3

0.4 ± 1.3**

0.11 ± 0.5

0.07 ± 0.3

Mid-ascending aorta

36.7*

1.5

27.5 ± 5.0

0.6 ± 1.4**

0.24 ± 0.6

0.16 ± 0.4

Distal ascending aorta

33.3*

2.9

25.3 ± 3.6

-0.1 ± 1.0

-0.01 ± 0.4

-0.01 ± 0.3

Proximal transverse aortic arch

24.1*

3.6

23.4 ± 3.6

0.1 ± 0.9

-0.01 ± 0.4

-0.01 ± 0.2

Distal transverse aortic arch

10.3

3.0

20.5 ± 2.7

0.1 ± 0.8

0.01 ± 0.4

0.01 ± 0.3

Aortic isthmus

14.1*

3.0

19.3 ± 2.3

0.1 ± 0.8

0.05 ± 0.4

0.03 ± 0.3

Proximal descending aorta

34.2*

1.5

19.5 ± 2.8

-0.1 ± 0.8

-0.01 ± 0.3

-0.01 ± 0.2

Distal descending aorta

30.7*

1.5

18.2 ± 2.2

-0.1 ± 0.6

-0.03 ± 0.3

-0.02 ± 0.2

  1. Continuous variables are expressed as means ± standard deviations.
  2. a Aortic dilation is defined by the mean + 1.96 standard deviations in the controls, and calculated from body surface area indexed diameters.
  3. b Aortic growth rates are calculated as the individual change in diameter from baseline to follow-up weighted individually for the duration of the follow-up.
  4. * P < 0.05 using chi-square or Fisher's exact 2-sided test to compare Turner syndrome to controls.
  5. ** P < 0.05 using Student's paired t-test to compare baseline aortic diameter to follow-up in Turner syndrome.