From: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: part II
Geometry Parameter | How is it chosen? | Why? | What is the limitation/ disadvantage? |
---|---|---|---|
Acquisition Matrix, NR, in the readout direction (Base Resolution) | 256 Minimum Increase to 512 preferred | To get best resolution in readout direction | 512 matrix increases TE and therefore TR. (increases scan time) |
Acquisition Matrix, NP, in the phase encoding direction | Maximise | To get best resolution in phase encoding direction | Increases Scan time (directly proportional) |
(depends on breath-hold period) | |||
SNR decreases as square root of increase | |||
No of slices, NS | Maximise | Increases coverage of volume thickness | Scan time (increases proportionally) |
(depends on breath-hold period, slice thickness and FOVS | |||
Increases SNR as square root | |||
(fixed slice thickness) | |||
Slice thickness, THK | Minimise for best resolution in the slice direction | Increases through-plane resolution | Decreases coverage |
FOVS = THKxNS |  |  | Decreases SNR (directly proportional) |
Field of View (FOVR) | Optimise for desired in-plane coverage | Aim to get best in-plane resolution without getting too much foldover | If too small, foldover becomes a problem. |
SNR decreases with FOVR (proportional to square). | |||
Rectangular Field of View factor (RFOV) | Minimise for desired coverage in phase encoding direction | Reduces scan time | Foldover is increased |
FOVP = RFOVxFOVR | |||
(NP reduces in same proportion as RFOV) | SNR is decreased | ||
(Proportional to square root) | |||
Zero filling/ interpolation | Apply in the slice direction | Doubles the number of reconstructed slices (but doesn’t improve resolution) | None |