Optimization of left ventricular ejection fraction measurement by two-dimensional echocardiography in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: comparison of geometric methods with cardiovascular magnetic resonance
© Lu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Published: 1 February 2012
In patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) predicts adverse clinical outcomes. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for LVEF measurement, but two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is commonly used for serial evaluation of LVEF. The optimal 2DE method for LVEF measurement and limiting factors in this population are not known.
This single-center retrospective study included all patients with rTOF with CMR performed 2007-2010 without general anesthesia and 2DE within 3 months of CMR, with adequate images for analysis by all 2DE methods. Two investigators blinded to CMR results measured LVEF from 2DE studies by biplane Simpson’s (BiS) method (using apical 4-chamber and apical or parasternal 3-chamber images), 5/6 area*length (AL), and visual estimate. Two investigators blinded to 2DE results measured LVEF from CMR by Simpson’s method, as well as by AL, to test validity of geometric assumptions. An investigator re-evaluated each modality at least one month later.
Correlation and agreement of 2DE methods with CMR
Mean LVEF (SD)
Mean difference (limits of agreement)
-2.5 (-10.1 to 5.2)
2DE visual estimate
-3.5 (-17.8 to 10.8)
-4.3 (-18.1 to 9.4)
-4.6 (-23.7 to 14.4)
In adults with rTOF, AL method better correlates with CMR than BiS, but with high intra- and interobserver variability for all 2DE methods. Lack of agreement is affected predominantly by 2DE-derived areas, particularly systolic, rather than ventricular length or geometric assumptions. Strategies to optimize image position and border detection are most likely to improve 2DE performance in this population.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.