Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Advanced techniques improve the performance of myocardial perfusion imaging

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201214 (Suppl 1) :P12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-S1-P12

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
  • Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Improve Image Quality
  • Steady State Free Precession Sequence
  • Respiratory Artefact

Background

Technical advances in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion imaging, particularly accelerated data acquisition methods, allow myocardial perfusion imaging with unprecedented spatio-temporal resolution. However, it is not clear how implementation of these advances affects perfusion image quality and artefacts and signal and contrast to noise ratios (SNR and CNR).

Methods

A standard ultrafast gradient echo perfusion sequence (st-GrE) was compared with an advanced kt-accelerated steady state free precession sequence (kt-SSFP) at 1.5T in a hardware perfusion phantom, healthy volunteers (n=16) and patients (n=31) with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Volunteers had both sequences at rest in alternating order. Patients underwent stress imaging with either st-GrE (15) or kt-SSFP (16) prior to X-ray coronary angiography.

The phantom was used to generate signal intensity curves and noise maps for SNR and CNR analysis. Human images were analysed by a blinded observer using a nominal scale for quality (0 non-diagnostic, 1 poor, 2 moderate, 3 good, 4 excellent) and respiratory artefacts (0 non-diagnostic, 1 severe, 2 moderate, 3 minor, 4 nil) and also for the presence of CAD in patients. Other analyses included the extent (% affected segments), transmurality (1: 1-25%, 2: 26-50%, 3: 51-75%, 4 76-100%) and duration (frames) of dark rim artefacts (DRA). Segmental SNR and CNR were also quantified using the mid ventricular slice in volunteers.

Results

Phantom studies demonstrated comparable SNR and CNR for both sequences: (SNR 54.7 & 53.9 and CNR 24.1 & 22.8 for st-GrE and kt-SSFP respectively). In normal hearts kt-SSFP imaging resulted in significantly improved image quality (p=0.003), SNR (21.0±6.7 vs. 18.8±6.6; p=0.009), CNR (15.4±6.1 vs. 14.0±6.0; p=0.034) and a reduced extent (p=<0.0001) and transmurality (p=0.0001) of DRA. In patients kt-SSFP imaging resulted in significantly improved image quality (p=0.012), and a reduced extent (p=<0.0001), duration (p=0.004) and transmurality (p=<0.0001) of DRA. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CAD against X-ray angiography was comparable with both sequences. There was a non-significant trend towards increased respiratory artefacts with kt-SSFP in both patients and volunteers.

Conclusions

Advanced high spatio-temporal resolution CMR perfusion imaging using a kt-SSFP technique results in significantly improved image quality, SNR and CNR and a reduction in the extent and transmurality of DRA compared to a standard sequence.

Funding

This work was supported by a European Union Grant (Grant number 224495 to GM, EN); the British Heart Foundation (Research Excellence Award RE/08/003 and FS/10/029/28253 to AS, EN); the Biomedical Research Centre (grant number BRC-CTF 196 to AS, EN) and the Wellcome Trust and EPSRC (grant number WT 088641/Z/09/Z to AC, EN).
Table 1

Perfusion sequence parameters

Parameter

st-GrE

kt-SSFP

Acquired spatial resolution

1.7 x 1.9 x 10mm

2.6 x 2.8 x 10mm

Echo time (TE)

Shortest (range 1.61-1.91ms)

Shortest (range 1.29-1.59ms)

Repetition time (TR)

Shortest (range 3.6-3.9ms)

Shortest (range 2.59-3.18ms)

Flip angle

18°

50°

Prepulse

90°

90°

Prepulse delay

100ms

100ms

Acceleration technique

SENSE: factor 2

kt-BLAST: factor 5 with 11 training profiles (effective k-t factor of 3.8)

Table 2

Sequence comparison

 

Volunteers

Patients

 

st-GRE

kt-SSFP

p value

st-GRE

kt-SSFP

p value

Image quality

n

%

n

%

 

n

%

n

%

 

0 non-diagnostic

1

6%

0

  

0

 

0

  

1 poor

0

 

0

  

3

10%

0

  

2 moderate

12

75%

3

19%

0.003

12

40%

2

6%

0.012

3 good

3

19%

12

75%

 

12

40%

17

53%

 

4 excellent

0

 

1

6%

 

3

10%

13

41%

 

Respiratory artefacts

          

0 non-diagnostic

0

 

0

  

0

 

0

  

1 severe

0

 

1

6%

 

0

 

2

6%

 

2 moderate

3

19%

5

31%

0.07

7

23%

7

22%

0.17

3 mild

7

44%

7

44%

 

8

27%

16

50%

 

4 nil

6

38%

3

19%

 

15

50%

7

22%

 

Dark rim artefact

          

Extent(%)

39±13

 

15±12

 

<0.0001

33±14

 

12±10

 

<0.0001

Transmurality

1.83±0.58

 

1.02±0.06

 

<0.0001

1.57±0.40

 

1.07±0.17

 

<0.0001

Duration

10.6±3.56

 

9.7±2.51

 

0.373

10.8±3.7

 

8.0±2.7

 

0.004

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
King's College London, London, UK

Copyright

Advertisement