Skip to main content

Comparison of systolic and diastolic criteria for isolated left ventricular noncompaction in cardiac MRI

Background

Interest in left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) as a distinct clinical form of cardiomyopathy is supported by recent publications. Echocardiographic and select cardiac MRI criteria have been established which are used to facilitate the diagnosis and have led to concerns of diagnostic accuracy. We used cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) to assess standard criteria for LVNC.

Methods

Trabeculation/ possible LVNC by cMRI was retrospectively observed among 122 consecutive cases and comprised our study population. We compared standard end systolic (ES) and end diastolic (ED) criteria previously established along with myocardial thickening (MT), ejection fraction (EF), 3D sphericity index (3DS), and LV end-diastolic volume index (EDVi). Using analysis of covariance, adjusted means for EF, MT, and 3DS were generated by adjusting for age, race, gender, body surface area (BSA), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure (CHF). Adjusting for these same covariates except CHF, logistic regression was used to compare the odds of CHF for those who met criteria for NC at ES vs. those at ED.

Results

ES noncompacted: compacted ratio (NCCR) had stronger correlations with MT (-0.49), EF (-68), EDVi (0.63), and 3DS (0.55) than the ED NCCR (MT: -0.22; EF: -0.25; EDVi: 0.37; 3DS: 0.32). After adjustment for covariates, those who met criteria for NC by ES NCCR had a lower EF (p=0.01) and less MT than those who did not (p =0.01 and p=0.003, respectively), but there was no statistical difference in EF or MT between those who met criteria for ED NCCR and those who did not. The odds ratio of CHF for those who met ES NCCR criteria was 29.4 (CI: 6.6-125), but the odds ratio of CHF for those who met ED NCCR criteria was 3.3 (CI: 1.1-9.2).

Conclusions

ES measures of NC have stronger associations with systolic dysfunction and CHF than the ED measures.

Funding

No funding source used for this project.

Table 1 Comparison of Ejection Fraction and Myocardial Thickening between End-Systolic and End-Diastolic Criteria for Noncompaction in Cardiac MRI
Table 2 Odds Ratios for Congestive Heart Failure by Noncompaction:Compaction Ratio

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon Stacey.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stacey, B., Hundley, W. & Thohan, V. Comparison of systolic and diastolic criteria for isolated left ventricular noncompaction in cardiac MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14, P148 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-S1-P148

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ejection Fraction
  • Congestive Heart Failure
  • Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
  • Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Lower Ejection Fraction