Skip to main content

Table 4 Inter-observer agreement of the Euro-CMR cases (n=30)

From: Quality assessment of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the setting of the European CMR registry: description and validation of standardized criteria

Reader

1 vs. 2

1 vs. 3

1 vs. 4

2 vs. 3

2 vs. 4

3 vs. 4

Qualitative quality assessment

Total quality score

      

Mean Δ±SD

0.9±3.6

1.9±2.9

−0.6±2.5

1.0±3.6

−1.6±3.6

−2.5±3.0

Mean score

8.4

7.9

9.2

7.5

8.7

8.2

Total quality score

      

Correlation coefficient

0.76

0.82

0.89

0.74

0.78

0.85

Inter-observer agreement

70%

77%

83%

73%

73%

73%

Quantitative quality assessment: SI analysis

LGE: Agreement for SNR scores

SI anterior wall

90%

86%

76%

83%

86%

79%

SI inferior wall

83%

72%

79%

90%

83%

79%

Perfusion: Agreement for scores of SI increase during first pass

SI anterior wall

76%

63%

80%

67%

90%

70%

SI inferior wall

81%

83%

73%

72%

79%

62%

Global assessment

      

Overall agreement

63%

73%

80%

63%

70%

67%

  1. Readers 1 and 2 are SCMR level 3 experts; reader 3 is a trained study nurse, reader 4 is a trained medical student.
  2. SI, signal intensity.
  3. All p-values of the linear regression analyses are <0.05.
  4. Qualitative evaluation is classified into tertiles: scores <9 / 9-16 / >16.
  5. LGE: Three scores of SNR: <2 / 2-5 / >5.
  6. Perfusion: Three scores of SI increase during first pass: <100% / 100-200% / >200%.