- Oral presentation
- Open Access
Cardiac amyloid burden assessment by T1 mapping predicts survival in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis - a 2 year follow-up study
© Banypersad et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Published: 16 January 2014
- Late Gadolinium Enhancement
- Cardiac Involvement
- Post Contrast
- Amyloid Burden
Cardiac involvement drives outcome in systemic AL amyloidosis. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR is useful for the detection of cardiac amyloid, but characteristic LGE patterns do not always occur or may appear late in the disease. Using CMR T1 mapping, we measured the pre contrast myocardial T1 and myocardial Extracellular Volume (ECV), reflecting myocardial amyloidosis burden and determined their prognostic significance.
102 patients underwent CMR and T1 mapping pre- and post contrast. Myocardial ECV was calculated at contrast equilibrium. 54 healthy volunteers served as controls. Patients were followed up for a median duration of 23 months and survival analyses were performed. A secondary analysis compared predictive power of the following techniques: pre contrast T1, post contrast T1, ECV at equilibrium (ECVi) and ECV at 15 minutes i.e. bolus only ECV (ECVb).
ECVi and ECVb were both raised compared to normals (both ECVi and ECVb means: 0.44 ± 0.12 vs 0.25 ± 0.02 for healthy volunteers, P < 0.001), as was native T1 (1081 ms vs 954 ms, P < 0.001). All 3 tracked pre-test probability of cardiac involvement, cardiac biomarkers and systolic and diastolic dysfunction. During follow-up, 25 deaths occurred. An ECVi of > 0.44 carried a hazard ratio for death of 3.76 (95% CI: 1.50 - 9.43), P = 0.005 and pre contrast T1 of > 1080 ms = HR 3.38 (95% CI: 1.21 - 9.45), p = 0.020. ECVi and ECVb performed similarly. Both ECVi and ECVb were stronger predictors of survival than pre contrast T1 as assessed by the (Harrell's C statistic). Isolated post contrast T1 was non predictive.
Myocardial ECV (bolus or infusion technique) and pre contrast T1 in AL amyloidosis are strong predictors of mortality with ECV (however measured) being the better predictor.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.