Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Comparison of different T2* sequences with and without parallel imaging for the assessment of iron overload

  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201416 (Suppl 1) :P259

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-16-S1-P259

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Iron Overload
  • Parallel Imaging
  • Parallel Sequence
  • Bland Altman Analysis

Background

Iron overload assessment using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has become the gold standard diagnostic method for this condition. Because patients usually need to undergo multiple exams throughout their lifetime it is important to assess if the myocardial and liver iron concentrations measured can be accomplished interchangeably using different techniques. We sought to examine whether different types of T2* sequences in the heart generate similar results and whether the use of parallel imaging in addition to each sequence (both in the heart and liver) would interfere in the final values obtained.

Methods

Eighty five patients undergoing regular transfusions underwent CMR imaging for the assessment of iron overload at 1.5T using a ROI-based T2* method. In the same exam, a multi-echo GRE single short-axis mid ventricular slice of the heart was obtained using the following sequences: (1) black-blood acquisition in diastole (BBD); (2) bright-blood acquisition in systole (BrBS); (3) bright-blood acquisition in diastole (BrBD). All sequences were obtained once with parallel imaging (R = 2) and again without it completing 6 different sets. A single multi-echo axial slice of the liver was also imaged twice with and without parallel imaging. All results were compared using repeated measures ANOVA (with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons) and Bland Altman analysis.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 28.7 ± 15.2 years with 49/85 (58%) men. No differences were observed among all the six variations of T2* sequences taken together (P = 0.13) and in pairwise comparisons: BBD non-parallel T2* of 28.1 ± 10.2 ms; BBD parallel 28.9 ± 12.0 ms; BrBS non-parallel 29.3 ± 11.7 ms; BrBS parallel 29.9 ± 12.1 ms; BrBD non-parallel 29.4 ± 11.9 ms; BrBD parallel 29.4 ± 12.3 ms. The T2* values for the liver using non-parallel imaging and parallel imaging were also similar with 6.6 ± 6.1 ms and 6.5 ± 6.2 ms, P = 0.97. Using the BBD non-parallel T2* as the reference for the heart, Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of -0.93 ms (-1.8 to -0.02 95%CI) to the BBD parallel sequence, -1.3 ms (-2.3 to -0.16) to the BrBS non-parallel sequence, -1.8 ms (-3.2 to -0.4) to the BrBS parallel sequence, -1.3 ms (-2.5 to -0.17) to the BrBD non-parallel sequence and -1.3 ms (-2.5 to -0.16) to the BrBD parallel sequence. For the liver, the mean difference among parallel and non-parallel images was -0.09 ms (-0.17 to -0.008 95% CI). Parallel imaging in the heart and in the liver allowed for a mean reduction of acquisition time of 42% (range 32 - 47%).

Conclusions

Different T2* sequences can be used to achieve similar measurements of iron overload both in the heart and liver. Moreover, the use of parallel imaging does not significantly interfere with the results allowing for faster acquisition without compromising the final values.

Funding

Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
(2)
Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Jose Michel Kalaf, Campinas, Brazil
(3)
Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany
(4)
Siemens Ltda, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Copyright

© Fernandes et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement