- Poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected inflammatory pericarditis
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance volume 17, Article number: P349 (2015)
Background
Although the diagnosis of inflammatory pericarditis is usually presumed on a combination of clinical signs and noninvasive testing, especially echocardiography, the presence and extent of pericardial inflammation as such cannot be visualized. Alternatively cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has shown appealing to study the pathologic pericardium. In this study we sought to explore the findings and the diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with clinically suspected inflammatory pericarditis.
Methods
Review of CMR data between January 2010 and December 2013 yielded 42 patients (51±16y, 31 males) with clinical suspicion of inflammatory pericarditis. In 21 patients (50%), it was their first presentation, the others presented a recurrence.
Results
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), performed at 3.6±5.6 days after symptom onset, showed a pericardial effusion in 14/42 patients (33.3%). CMR, performed 7.1±5 days after symptom onset, showed a pericardial thickness of 2.3±1.4mm (max 6.4mm). In 11 patients (26%) a pericardial effusion was present. On T2-weighted imaging pericardial edema was present in 23/40 patients (58%) while pericardial enhancement was found on late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) images in 39/42 patients (93%). Six patients showed concomitant subepicardial myocardial enhancement. Real-time cine CMR showed inspiratory septal flattening/inversion in 11 patients. Patients with pericardial thickness ≥4mm (n=8), more frequently presented with fever (p=0.026), had increased C-reactive protein values (p<0.0005), increased signal intensity of pericardial enhancement (p=0.016), and increased septal shift (p=0.001). No significant differences with respect to clinical presentation and CMR findings were found between patients with first and recurrent pericarditis. Seven patients presented recurrence during follow-up (mean 414 days). CMR findings yielded no significant prognostic value on events occurrence.
Conclusions
In patients with clinical suspicion of inflammatory pericarditis, CMR is a valuable tool to appreciate the presence and severity of pericardial inflammation. As such, this technique may be helpful in doubtful cases and to rule out concomitant myocardial involvement.
Funding
No funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Cruz, I., Muscogiuri, G., Sinnaeve, P. et al. Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected inflammatory pericarditis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17 (Suppl 1), P349 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-P349
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-P349