Skip to content

Advertisement

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volume 18 Supplement 1

19th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions

Open Access

Would adding two left atrial piloted images to a cardiac magnetic resonance protocol enable rapid, accurate calculation of left atrial volume? Use of 320 slice cardiac CT as proof of concept.

  • Nitesh Nerlerkar1 and
  • Stuart Moir1
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201618(Suppl 1):Q51

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-18-S1-Q51

Published: 27 January 2016

Keywords

Cardiac Magnetic ResonanceAccurate CalculationLeft Atrial VolumeChamber ViewBlinded Observer

Background

Left atrial volume (LAV) is an important prognostic predictor in cardiac disease. LAV is not routinely evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as acquisition of a full volume dataset is time consuming, and previous authors have shown calculation of LAV using the biplane area-length method (BAL) from routinely acquired 4 and 2 chamber views (4CV, 2CV) significantly underestimates true volume. We hypothesized this underestimation was due to standard CMR 4CV and 2CV images (piloted from mid mitral valve to LV apex - LV piloting) foreshortening the atrium, and that additional 4CV and 2CV images piloted from mid mitral valve to the mid posterior wall of the left atrium (LA piloting) would enable rapid, accurate calculation of LAV using BAL.

Methods

We evaluated 3-D datasets from 44 consecutive patients undergoing retrospective 320 slice cardiac computed tomographic studies. True 3-D left atrial volume (gold standard) was calculated at end systole by a blinded observer excluding pulmonary veins and left atrial appendage. A second blinded observer manipulated images to create standard ‘CMR' 4 and 2 chamber views piloted from mid mitral valve to LV apex (standard LV piloted) enabling measurement of LAV using BAL. The dataset was then manipulated / 're-piloted' from mid mitral valve to the middle of posterior LA (LA piloted) and LAV was re-measured - see figure.

Results

As previously shown, LAVI calculated with BAL from LV piloted 4CV and 2CV images significantly underestimates true LAV (see table). Mean LAV calculated from LA piloted images was not significantly different from true LA volume and there was a strong correlation between the 2 with narrow confidence intervals.

Conclusions

Accurate calculation of LAV can be made using BAL method from LA piloted images, and is superior to calculation from standard LV piloted images. Addition of two LA piloted images to a standard CMR protocol may enable rapid and accurate calculation of an important prognostic marker for cardiovascular disease.

Table 1

Method

Mean ± SD (ml)

95% Confidence Interval

Correlation to 3D LAV (r-value)

Mean difference comparison to 3D-LAV (paired t-test p value)

 

3-D LA volume

82 ± 24

    

LV piloted LA volume

67 ± 28

(-19,-12)

0.898

<0.001

 

LA piloted LA volume

81 ± 27

(-5,1)

0.922

0.27

 

Figure 1

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Monash HEART, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia

Copyright

© Nerlerkarrlerkar and Moir 2016

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement