A review of 3D first-pass, whole-heart, myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Fair, Merlin J.; Gatehouse, Peter D.; DiBella, Edward V. R.; Firmin, David N.

doi:10.1186/s12968-015-0162-9

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Table 1 Overview of technical developments in 3D whole-heart first-pass perfusion

From: A review of 3D first-pass, whole-heart, myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Lead Author	Year	Reconstruction Method	Trajectory	Other Stated Efficiencies*	US Factor (Nominal)	US Factor (True)	Resolution/mm	Acquisition Window/ms	Stress Agent	Free Breathing†	Field Strength/T
Shin [70]	2008	TSENSE	Cartesian	-	6	6	3.0 × 4.5 × 10.0	304	No	No	3
Shin [19]	2010	TSENSE	Cartesian	-	6	6	4.5 × 6.7 × 10.0^a/2.8 × 4.2 × 10.0^b	116-145^a/254-305^b	No	No	3
Manka [79]◊	2011	k-t SENSE	Cartesian	Partial Fourier	NS	6.3	2.3 × 2.3 × 10.0	200	Yes	No	3
Vitanis [81]	2011	k-t PCA (compartment based)	Cartesian	Elliptical Shutter (75 %); Partial Fourier (75 %)	10	5.6 - 7.5	2.3 × 2.3 × 10.0	225	Yes	No	3
DiBella [25]	2012	CS (temporal)	Radial	-	~14‡	~14‡	2.2 × 2.2 × 8.0	310	No	No	3
Manka [125] ◊	2012	k-t PCA	Cartesian	Partial Fourier	10	7	2.3 × 2.3 × 10.0	NS	Yes	No	1.5
Jogiya [126] ◊	2012	k-t PCA	Cartesian	Partial Fourier	10	7	2.3 × 2.3 × 5.0	NS	Yes	No	3
Chen [44]	2012	CS (spatio- temporal)	Radial	Partial Fourier (75 %)	~9-11‡	~9-11‡	(1.8-2.8) × (1.8-2.8) × (6.0-10.0)	300	No	No	3
Shin [39]	2013	k-t SENSE	Spiral	-	5	5	2.4 × 2.4 × 9.0^~	230	No	No	1.5
Giri [24]	2014	TWIST (GRAPPA)	Cartesian	2D Partial Fourier§ (87.5 %/87.5 %)	3	3	2.2 × 2.8 × 8.0	300-380	No	No	1.5
Motwani [56]	2014	k-t PCA	Cartesian	2D Partial Fourier (70 %/70 %)	10	7	2.3 × 2.3 × 5.0	192	Yes	No	3
Schmidt [58]	2014	k-t PCA (motion-corrected)	Cartesian	Elliptical Shutter; 3D Partial Fourier (62.5 %/75 %/75 %)	10	NS	2.3 × 2.3 × 10.0	205-225	No	Yes	3
Akçakaya [105]	2014	CS (localised constraints)	Cartesian	Elliptical Shutter (75 %)	10	10	2.3 × 2.3 × 10.0	250	No	Both	1.5
Jogiya [57]◊	2014^e	k-t PCA	Cartesian	Elliptical Shutter; 2D Partial Fourier (75 %/75 %)	10	7	2.3 × 2.3 × 5.0	191	Yes	No	3
Jogiya [21]	2014	k-t PCA	Cartesian	Elliptical Shutter; 3D Partial Fourier (NS/75 %/75 %)	10	7	2.3 × 2.3 × 5.0	191	Yes	No	3
Wang [45]	2014^e	CS (spatio-temporal)	Cartesian	Partial Fourier (83 %)	11	11	(2.0-2.4) × (2.0-2.4) × (4.0-6.0)	255	No	No	3
Manka [130]◊	2015^e	k-t PCA	Cartesian	Elliptical Shutter; 2D Partial Fourier (75 %/75 %)	10	7	2.3 × 2.3 × 5.0	200	Yes	No	3

◊Clinically relevant/tested techniques – see Table 2 for details
*Zero padding typically not stated when applied, so not included in the table
†Imaging during breath-hold assumed in cases where literature did not state
‡US factor estimated from number of radial projections and number of readouts: N_Nyquist = (π/2) * N_readouts, N.b. using this definition radial trajectories require π/2 greater acceleration to be equivalent to a Cartesian acquisition time
§Only applied in cases of high HR
^aSystolic acquisition values
^bDiastolic acquisition values
^~Nominal spatial resolution can be affected by off-resonance errors in long spiral readouts
^eDate of early online publication, yet to be published fully at time of print
NB The acquisition window as far as possible is the pure image data acquisition time not including saturation recovery delay pre-imaging as that is not normally motion-sensitive
Abbreviations: US undersampling; NS not stated; others as defined in text

Back to article page

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us

Submission enquiries: Access here and click Contact Us
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com