Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between angiography and regional myocardial stress perfusion < 2.0 ml/min/g for the 12 patients with PET (A) and CMR (B) before angiography

From: Fully quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion ready for clinical use: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography

A

 

Angiography

B

 

Angiography

  

+

–

  

+

–

PET

+

6

3

CMR

+

4

2

–

0

3

–

2

4

Back to article page

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us