Fig. 3
Quantitative Tissue Properties of Cardiac Neoplasm and Thrombus. a SNR (left) and CNR (right) compared between CNEO and CTHR (data shown as overall distribution [line bars] together with 25–75% distribution [box], and median [central line]). Note that SNR and CNR were generally higher for CNEO, consistent with contrast-enhancement secondary to vascular supply. b SNR and CNR comparisons inclusive of CNEO subtypes (diffuse and heterogeneous enhancement). Increased CNR within heterogeneously enhancing lesions (p < 0.001 vs. other types) consistent with interspersed regions with and without adequate vascular supply