Skip to main content

Table 4 Echocardiography vs 4D-flow CMR

From: Tricuspid flow and regurgitation in congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension: comparison of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography

  1. Contingency table depicting the results for TR grading by echocardiography versus 4D-flow CMR (clinically most relevant group, with either moderate or severe TR, highlighted). The linear weighted kappa for agreement between both methods was 0.52 (95%-confidence interval 0.37-0.67)