Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 3

From: Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance: extracellular volume, native T1 and 18F-FDG PET/CMR imaging in patients after revascularized myocardial infarction and association with markers of myocardial damage and systemic inflammation

Fig. 3

Comparison of maximum sector values between ECV/18F-FDG (a), native T1/18F-FDG (b) and ECV/native T1 (c) for all 25 patients, showing no significant correlations between the three methods. All points in plots (a-c) are equivalent to a per-patient average of the two highest sector values shown in the corresponding pooled comparisons in Fig. 2 (a-c)

Back to article page

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us