Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of fast left atrial strain (ε) and strain rate (SR) measurements among subject groups

From: Validation of a rapid semi-automated method to assess left atrial longitudinal phasic strains on cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Parameters

Normal Controls (n = 50)

HCM (n = 30)

HFpEF (n = 30)

HFmrEF (n = 30)

HFrEF (n = 40)

Left atrial longitudinal strain

 Reservoir εs, %

35.3 ± 5.2

27.0 ± 4.8*

23.8 ± 4.5*#

18.8 ± 6.6*#$

12.0 ± 5.8*#$^

 Conduit εe, %

18.1 ± 4.3

12.1 ± 4.3*

9.6 ± 3.2*#

8.6 ± 3.4*#

6.1 ± 3.1*#$^

 Booster εa, %

17.2 ± 3.5

14.9 ± 3.5*

14.2 ± 3.7*

10.2 ± 4.9*#$

6.0 ± 3.8*#$^

Left atrial longitudinal strain rate

 Reservoir SRs, 1/s

1.8 ± 0.4

1.3 ± 0.3*

1.1 ± 0.2*#

0.9 ± 0.3*#$

0.6 ± 0.2*#$^

 Conduit SRe, 1/s

−2.0 ± 0.5

−1.1 ± 0.4*

−0.9 ± 0.3*#

−0.8 ± 0.3*#

−0.6 ± 0.3*#$^

 Booster SRa, 1/s

−2.3 ± 0.6

−1.8 ± 0.4*

−1.7 ± 0.3*

−1.2 ± 0.5*#$

− 0.7 ± 0.4*#$^

  1. Data are represented as mean ± SD. HCM: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, HFpEF heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, HFmrEF heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction, HFrEF heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, *significant difference compared to controls, #significant difference compared to HCM, $significant difference compared to HFpEF, ^significant difference compared to HFmrEF