Skip to main content

Table 1 Dice scores between automated segmentation and manual segmentation for native T1 maps for the PHiSeg and U-Net segmentation networks, as well between segmentations by different human observers. The first two columns show the difference between automated and manual segmentations on a test set of 100 subjects. The third to fifth columns show the inter-observer variability, which is evaluated on a randomly selected set of 30 subjects (15 healthy subjects and 15 chronic cardiomyopathy subjects), each being analysed by three different human observers (O1, O2, O3) independently. Dice values are reported as mean (SD)

From: Automated quantification of myocardial tissue characteristics from native T1 mapping using neural networks with uncertainty-based quality-control

 

PHiSeg Auto vs Manual

U-Net Auto vs Manual

O1 vs O2

O1 vs O3

O2 vs O3

 

(N=100)

(N=100)

(N=30)

(N=30)

(N=30)

LV Blood pool

0.95 (1.63)

0.89 (7.96)

0.94 (2.22)

0.91 (2.83)

0.95 (1.66)

LV Myocardium

0.84 (3.16)

0.78 (8.89)

0.77 (7.57)

0.77 (6.53)

0.83 (2.56)

RV blood pool

0.92 (4.14)

0.81 (15.96)

0.84 (13.86)

0.90 (5.47)

0.91 (6.55)

  1. LV, left ventricular; RV, right ventricular