Skip to main content

Table 5 Intra- and inter-observer measurement variability

From: Quantification of regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse with four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance

  

Bland–Altman*

ICC

CV, %

4D flow CMR indirect method

Intra-observer

MV SV

− 1.0 (21 to − 23)

0.982

7

 

LVOT SV

− 1.1 (9 to − 11)

0.979

5

Inter-observer

MV SV

0.8 (37 to − 36)

0.938

12

 

LVOT SV

1.0 (19 to − 17)

0.919

10

4D flow CMR direct method

Intra-observer

MV RVol

− 2.7 (14 to − 20)

0.971

17

Inter-observer

MV RVol

− 3.1 (33 to − 39)

0.868

32

Standard CMR method

Intra-observer

LV SV

1.5 (8 to − 5)

0.998

2.5

 

Ao FF

− 0.1 (3 to − 3)

0.999

1.5

Inter-observer

LV SV

2.7 (19 to − 13)

0.989

6

 

Ao FF

0.5 (10 to − 9)

0.986

5

2D-PISA method

Intra-observer

MV RVol

2.1 (20 to − 16)

0.986

12

Inter-observer

MV RVol

3.2 (34 to − 28)

0.959

15

  1. 4D Flow CMR time-resolved, three-dimensional anatomic coverage, three-directional velocity-encoded phase contrast CMR, MV mitral valve, LVOT left ventricle outflow tract, SV stroke volume, RVol regurgitant volume, LV left ventricle, Ao FF aortic forward flow, 2D-PISA, proximal isovelocity surface area, ICC intraclass correlation coefficient, CV coefficient of variation. *Mean difference (2-sided 95% confidence limits of agreement). † All P < 0.001