Skip to main content

Table 3 Pooled prevalence of abnormal CMR findings

From: Prevalence of abnormal cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in recovered patients from COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Parameter (number of studies)

Overall

Study population

Cardiac enzyme level†

Prevalence (%)

Heterogeneity*

Non-athletes (n = 10)

Athletes (n = 6)

Normal (n = 9)

Undetermined (n = 8)

Prevalence (%)

Heterogeneity*

Prevalence (%)

Heterogeneity*

Prevalence (%)

Heterogeneity*

Prevalence (%)

Heterogeneity*

Abnormal CMR findings (n = 16)

46.4 [43.2–49.7]

 < 0.01, 95%

62.5 [58.5–66.4] (n = 10)

 < 0.01 86%

17.1 [13.3–21.7] (n = 6)

 < 0.01, 92%

35.9 [31.7–40.3] (n = 9)

 < 0.01, 95%

59.4 [54.5–64.04] (n = 8)

 < 0.01, 77%

Diagnosis of myocarditis on CMR (n = 12)

14.0 [11.6–16.8]

 < 0.01, 93%

23.9 [19.8–28.5] (n = 6)

 < 0.01, 85%

2.5 [01.3–5.0] (n = 6)

0.11, 64%

15.2 [12.1–19.0] (n = 8)

 < 0.01, 90%

12.0 [8.5–16.8] (n = 5)

 < 0.01, 90%

Presence of pericardial LGE (n = 14)

5.0 [3.8–6.7]

 < 0.01, 94%

4.1 [2.7–6.1] (n = 8)

 > 0.99, 98%

6.7 [4.4–10.0] (n = 6)

 < 0.01, 86%

10.4 [7.1–15.1] (n = 5)

 < 0.01, 88%

24.8 [20.6–29.6] (n = 7)

 < 0.01, 96%

Presence of myocardial LGE (n = 15)

20.7 [18.1–23.5]

 < 0.01, 93%

28.8 [25.2–32.7] (n = 9)

 < 0.01, 92%

6.7 [4.4–10.0] (n = 6)

 < 0.01, 82%

8.6 [6.0–12.1] (n = 8)

 < 0.01, 83%

36.5 [31.8–41.4] (n = 7)

 < 0.01, 93%

Presence of LGE (myocardial or pericardial) (n = 13)

20.5 [17.7–23.6]

 < 0.01, 92%

28.1 [24.1–32.4] (n = 8)

 < 0.01, 92%

7.8 [5.2–11.7] (n = 5)

 < 0.01, 84%

8.3 [5.8–11.8] (n = 8)

 < 0.01, 85%

45.5 [39.2–51.9] (n = 5)

 < 0.01, 75%

Increased native T1 value on the T1 map (n = 10)

26.3 [23.1–29.8]

 < 0.01, 97%

39.8 [35.2–44.6] (n = 5)

 < 0.01, 92%

4.4 [2.4–7.7] (n = 5)

0.02, 81%

1.0 [0.1–8.7] (n = 4)

 > 0.99, 0%

35.7 [30.7–41.1] (n = 6)

 < 0.01, 88%

T2 abnormality (n = 12)

16.9 [14.3–19.8]

 < 0.01, 94%

22.9 [19.3–26.9] (n = 7)

 < 0.01, 95%

4.4 [2.4–8.0] (n = 5)

0.08, 75%

10.4 [7.1–15.1] (n = 5)

 < 0.01, 88%

24.8 [20.6–29.6] (n = 7)

 < 0.01, 96%

T2 abnormality without LGE (n = 8)

4.0 [2.3–6.7]

0.98, 91%

12.9 [6.8–22.9] (n = 3)

0.061, 73%

1.6 [0.6–4.1] (n = 5)

 > 0.99, 90%

5.7 [3.3–9.5] (n = 5)

 < 0.01, 83%

2.2 [0.5–8.2] (n = 4)

 > 0.99, 76%

Presence of myocardial LGE without T2 abnormality (n = 7)

4.0 [2.3–7.0]

0.01, 58%

3.8 [0.2–46.6] (n = 3)

0.85, 0%

4.1 [2.2–7.4] (n = 4)

 < 0.01, 71%

4.4 [2.4–8.0] (n = 5)

 < 0.01, 64%

1.6 [0–100] (n = 2)

 > 0.99, 0%

Pericardial effusion (n = 11)

15.7 [13.2–18.5]

 < 0.01, 93%

17.3 [14.1–21.0] (n = 6)

 < 0.01, 86%

12.8 [9.3–17.5] (n = 5)

 < 0.01, 89%

5.2 [3.0–9.0] (n = 5)

 < 0.01, 75%

17.0 [13.4–21.4] (n = 6)

 < 0.01, 91%

Ventricular systolic dysfunction on cine (n = 10)

4.7 [3.3–6.6]

0.17, 62%

7.4 [2.9–17.3] (n = 4)

0.28, 27%

1.3 [0.4.–4.5] (n = 6)

0.98, 0%

NA

NA

7.4 [3.1–16.8] (n = 4)

0.34, 22%

  1. Numbers in brackets represent 95% confidence intervals
  2. CMR cardiovascular magnetic resonance, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, n number of studies
  3. *Values indicate p-values for the Cochran Q test and I2