Skip to main content

Table 3 Six multiple regression models: determinants of AF in all HCM patients, and in those with LA diameter < 45mm, indicating a low risk for AF development

From: Incremental value of left atrial booster and reservoir strain in predicting atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Model 5

Model 6

 

LA diameter

LAESV index

LA reservoir strain

LA conduit strain

LA booster strain

LAEF

 

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

All HCM patients, n = 238

      

 Age ≥ 55

5.07 (2.23–11.55)**

4.72 (2.06–10.95)**

4.05 (1.73–9.46)**

4.42 (1.76–11.06)**

6.62 (2.79–15.70)**

4.19 (1.80–9.76)**

 LA diameter ≥ 42 mm

1.92 (0.95–3.91)

–

–

–

–

–

 LAESV index ≥ 27 mL/m2

–

1.82 (0.90–3.68)

–

–

–

–

 LA reservoir strain ≤ 18%

–

–

2.56 (1.24–5.27)*

–

–

–

 LA conduit strain ≤ 12%

–

–

–

1.58 (0.58–4.25)

–

–

 LA booster strain ≤ 8%

–

–

–

–

3.69 (1.81–7.52)**

–

 LAEF ≤ 45%

–

–

–

–

–

2.43 (1.20–4.92)*

HCM patients with LA diameter < 45 mm, n = 217

      

 Age ≥ 55

4.05 (1.72–9.51)**

4.73 (2.04–10.96)**

3.34 (1.38–8.06)**

3.41 (1.30–8.96)*

5.78 (2.35–14.23)**

3.67 (1.53–8.81)**

 LA diameter ≥ 42 mm

1.94 (0.84–4.47)

–

–

–

–

–

 LAESV index ≥ mL/m2

–

1.82 (0.90–3.68)

–

–

–

–

 LA reservoir strain ≤ 18%

–

–

2.49 (1.13–5.32)*

–

–

–

 LA conduit strain ≤ 12%

–

–

–

1.72 (0.60–4.90)

–

–

 LA booster strain ≤ 8%

–

–

–

–

3.74 (1.70–8.07)**

–

 LAEF ≤ 45%

–

–

–

–

–

1.98 (0.92–4.28)

  1. EF, ejection fraction, HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, HR, hazard ratio, LA, left atria, LAEDV, left atrial end diastolic volume, LAEF, left atrial ejection fraction
  2. *Indicates a significant difference of P < 0.05
  3. **Indicates a significant difference of P < 0.01