Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics

From: Accuracy of stroke volume measurement with phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis

Clinical data

All patients (n = 88)

Age, years

55 [31–69]

Male sex, n (%)

60 (68%)

Bicuspid aortic valve, n (%)

36 (41%)

Echocardiographic data

Peak aortic valve velocity, m/s*

2.3 [1.7–3.0]

Mean gradient*

13 [4, 7–19]

Aortic stenosis severity*

  Aortic sclerosis (Vmax < 200 cm/s)

31 (35%)

  Mild (Vmax 200–300 cm/s)

38 (43%)

  Moderate (Vmax 300–400 cm/s)

13 (15%)

  Severe (Vmax > 400 cm/s)

6 (7%)

Aortic regurgitation*

 None/trace

66 (75)

 Mild

16 (18)

 Moderate

6 (7)

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance data

Eccentric jet (angle < 85°), n (%)

45 (51%)

 Among trileaflet valve

19 (36%)

 Among bicuspid valve

26 (72%)

LVEDV, ml

155 ± 40

LVEDV (excluding PM), ml

138 ± 35

LVESV, ml

67 ± 24

LVESV (excluding PM), ml

52 ± 19

LVEF, %

57 ± 6

LVEF (excluding PM), %

63 ± 7

RVEDV, ml

159 ± 41

RVESV, ml

74 ± 25

RVEF, %

54 ± 6

Aortic diameter, cm

3.5 ± 0.4

 Among trileaflet valve

3.4 ± 0.4

 Among bicuspid valve

3.6 ± 0.5

Stroke volume estimations

LV stroke volume (volumetric), ml

87 ± 20

LV stroke volume (volumetric, excluding PM), ml

86 ± 20

LV stroke volume (PCAA), ml

80 ± 20

LV stroke volume (PCLVOT), ml

84 ± 20

RV stroke volume (volumetric), ml

85 ± 19

  1. *By Echocardiography. Data presented as count (%), mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range] according to variable distribution. LV left ventricular, RV right ventricular, EDV end-diastolic volume, ESV end-systolic volume, EF ejection fraction, PC phase-contrast, PM papillary muscles, SV stroke volume