Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the cost-effectiveness literature of CMR for CAD (15 total studies)

From: Evidence-based cardiovascular magnetic resonance cost-effectiveness calculator for the detection of significant coronary artery disease

Attribute

# of studies

% of studies (%)

Study citations

Setting

 US setting

5

33

Moschetti et al. [24], Stojanovic et al. [29], Sharples et al. [28], Genders et al. [20], Ge et al. [13, 31]

 European setting (including the UK)

11

73

Walker et al. [14], Boldt et al. [22], Thom et al. [30], Petrov et al. [25], Pontone et al. [27], Pletscher et al. [26], Moschetti et al. [24], Sharples et al. [28], Genders et al. [20], Campbell et al. [23], Walker et al. [31]

 Other setting

2

13

Bertoldi et al. [21], Kozor et al. [32]

Comparators included

 No imaging

2

13

Genders et al. [20], Ge et al. [13]

 Stress echocardiography

4

27

Thom et al. [30], Sharples et al. [28], Genders et al. [20], Bertoldi et al. [21]

 Stress electrocardiography

4

27

Walker et al. [14], Pletscher et al. [26], Bertoldi et al. [21], Walker et al. [31]

 SPECT

11

73

Walker et al. [14], Boldt et al. [22], Thom et al. [30], Pletscher et al. [26], Sharples et al. [28], Genders et al. [20], Stojanovic et al. [29], Sharples et al. [28], Ge et al. [13], Walker et al. [31], Kozor et al. [32], Walker et al. [31]

 CCTA

5

33

Pontone et al. [27], Genders et al. [20], Bertoldi et al. [21], Ge et al. [13]

 Immediate coronary angiography

10

67

Walker et al. [14], Boldt et al. [22], Thom et al. [30], Petrov et al. [25], Pletscher et al. [26], Moschetti et al. [24], Sharples et al. [28], Ge et al. [13], Walker et al. [31], Kozor et al. [32]

Main conclusion on CMR value

 CMR cost-effective

10

67

Walker et al. [14], Boldt et al. [22], Petrov et al. [25], Pontone et al. [27], Pletscher et al. [26], Moschetti et al. [24], Stojanovic et al. [29], Ge et al. [13], Walker et al. [31], Kozor et al. [32]

 CMR not cost-effective

2

13

Genders et al. [20], Bertoldi et al. [21]

 Unclear cost-effectiveness

3

20

Thom et al. [30], Sharples et al. [28], Campbell et al. [23]

Key drivers of cost-effectiveness results

 Underlying CAD prevalence

9

60

Walker et al. [14], Boldt et al. [22], Thom et al. [30], Pletscher et al. [26], Moschetti et al. [24], Stojanovic et al. [29], Genders et al. [20], Ge et al. [13], Kozor et al. [32]

 Test costs

4

27

Pletscher et al. [26], Moschetti et al. [24], Sharples et al. [28], Bertoldi et al. [21]

Perspective taken

 Societal

1

8

Genders et al. [20]

 Healthcare system or payer

10

67

Walker et al. [14], Boldt et al. [22], Pletscher et al. [26], Moschetti et al. [24], Stojanovic et al. [29], Bertoldi et al. [21], Campbell et al. [23], Ge et al. [13], Walker et al. [31], Kozor et al. [32]

 Hospital

1

7

Stojanovic et al. [29]

 Not clearly stated

4

27

Thom et al. [30], Petrov et al. [25], Pontone et al. [27], Sharples et al. [28]

Model time horizon

 Lifetime

7

47

Walker et al. [14], Pletscher et al. [26], Genders et al. [20], Bertoldi et al. [21], Campbell et al. [23], Ge et al. [13], Kozor et al. [32]

 10–30 years

2

13

Boldt et al. [22], Petrov et al. [25]

 3–10 years

1

7

Thom et al. [30]

 < 3 years

4

27

Pontone et al. [27], Stojanovic et al. [29], Sharples et al. [28], Walker et al. [31]

 Not stated

1

7

Moschetti et al. [24]