Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Table 4 Correlation table in infarct segments. Correlation is using Pearson correlation. P value is considered significant at the 0.05 level

From: The relationship between myocardial microstructure and strain in chronic infarction using cardiovascular magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and feature tracking

	RHM	CHM	LHM	FA	MD	E2A
GLS
Correlation	− 0.603	− 0.243	0.572	− 0.661	0.669	− 0.673
P value	< 0.001	0.179	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
GRS
Correlation	0.697	− 0.018	− 0.371	0.552	− 0.693	0.529
P value	< 0.001	0.922	0.037	0.002	< 0.001	0.002
GCS
Correlation	− 0.608	− 0.144	0.438	− 0.404	0.515	− 0.591
P value	< 0.001	0.431	0.012	0.027	0.004	< 0.001
SLS
Correlation	− 0.506	− 0.193	0.486	− 0.442	0.423	− 0.558
P value	0.003	0.289	0.005	0.015	0.02	0.001
SRS
Correlation	0.498	0.134	− 0.440	0.414	− 0.478	0.444
P value	0.004	0.466	0.012	0.023	0.008	0.011
SCS
Correlation	− 0.466	0.063	0.221	− 0.360	0.394	− 0.341
P value	0.007	0.732	0.224	0.051	0.031	0.056

SLS segmental longitudinal strain, SRS Segmental radial strain, SCS Segmental circumferential strain

Back to article page

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us

Submission enquiries: Access here and click Contact Us
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com