Skip to main content

Table 5. Correlation table in remote segments. Correlation is using Pearson correlation. P value is considered significant at the 0.05 level

From: The relationship between myocardial microstructure and strain in chronic infarction using cardiovascular magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and feature tracking

 

RHM

CHM

LHM

FA

MD

E2A

GLS

      

 Correlation

0.079

− 0.268

0.222

− 0.354

0.537

− 0.023

 P value

0.669

0.137

0.222

0.060

0.003

0.901

GRS

      

 Correlation

0.104

0.165

− 0.130

0.406

− 0.522

0.01

 P value

0.573

0.368

0.478

0.029

0.004

0.957

GCS

      

 Correlation

− 0.097

− 0.389

0.356

− 0.408

0.408

0.092

 P value

0.597

0.028

0.045

0.028

0.028

0.615

SLS

      

 Correlation

0.107

− 0.298

0.249

− 0.221

0.461

− 0.051

 P value

0.560

0.098

0.169

0.249

0.012

0.781

SRS

      

 Correlation

0.430

− 0.022

− 0.159

0.222

− 0.260

− 0.058

 P value

0.014

0.906

0.385

0.247

0.173

0.752

SCS

      

 Correlation

− 0.189

0.044

0.088

− 0.318

0.145

0.030

 P value

0.300

0.810

0.633

0.093

0.452

0.872

  1. SLS segmental longitudinal strain, SRS Segmental radial strain, SCS Segmental circumferential strain
Back to article page

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us