Skip to main content

Table 3 univariate and multivariate analysis of predictors of c-VA

From: Additional value of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking parameters for the evaluation of the arrhythmic risk in patients with mitral valve prolapse

Univariate logistic analysis of predictors of cVA

Multivariate analysis stepwise based on p model**

 

OR

95% CI

P value

OR

95% CI

P value

MR regurgitant fraction (%)

89.40

0.66–1.22

0.0723

LGE

9.52

2.28–39.7

0. 002

8.5

1.9–38.2

0.008

Number of LGE segments

1.78

1.21–2.63

0.004

MAD length

1.18

0.97–1.44

0.087

Mean native T1 relaxation time (ms)

1.01

0.97–1.03

0.130

Native T1 relaxation time of inferolateral wall (ms)

1.01

1.00–1.02

0.038

Native T1 relaxation time of inferior wall (ms)

1.01

0.99–1.02

0.256

Mean ECV

1.24

0.08–1.87

0.222

ECV inferior wall

1.11

0.01–3.64

0.127

ECV inferolateral wall

1.12

1.22–1.98

0.047

GLS (%)

1.58

1.21–2.07

0.0009

1.6

1.45–2.47

0.007

LS basal Inferior wall (%)

1.11

1.00–1.23

0.545

1.6

1.22–2.13

0.0007

LS midventricular Inferior wall (%)

1.05

0.97–1.13

0.185

LS basal inferolateral wall (%)

1.11

1.00–1.23

0.047

LS midventricular inferolateral wall (%)

1.62

1.22–2.13

0.0007

CS (%)

1.13

0.98–1.29

0.077

CS basal inferolateral wall (%)

9.52

2.28–39.70

0. 001

CS mid-ventricular inferolateral wall (%)

1.41

1.16–1.72

0.0005

CS basal inferior wall (%)

1.00

1.000–1.010

0.0675

CS midventricular inferior wall (%)

3.58

0.8760–14.60

0.0759

2.1

1.87–3.17

0.006

  1. MR mitral regurgitation, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, MAD mitral annular disjunction, ECV extracellular volume fraction, GLS global longitudinal strain, LS longitudinal strain, GCS global circumferential strain, CS circumferential strain
  2. *Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit (GOF) test: X-squared = 7.5543, df = 8, p-value = 0.4446. Percentage correct 92.68%