- Poster presentation
Effective fat-suppression for late gadolinium enhancement combined with a sequential acquisition order
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonancevolume 11, Article number: P75 (2009)
Fat suppression is valuable for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging, for situations in which an enhanced structure is adjacent to fat (e.g. myocardium at the apex of the left ventricle, vessel walls, and the thin atrial walls), where fat might be mistaken for fibrosis. However, the acquisition order of the segmented LGE sequence is also critical, and a sequential acquisition order is superior to a centric acquisition order when visualizing small areas of scar, in which the "edge-enhancement" (i.e. the stronger weighting of the edges of k-space due to signal regrowth during the acquisition window) effect is not desired. A fat-suppressed LGE sequence using a sequential acquisition order may be optimal, but is not feasible using the typical fat-selective (spectrally-selective) RF pulse with a flip angle from 90° to 180° preceding the sequential acquisition. To address this, we developed a "fat restore" method for fat-suppressed LGE.
Without a "fat restore" pulse, the fat experiences two 180°s. The 1st 180° (the non-selective inversion always used in LGE) results in greatly reduced Mzfat at the time of the 2nd fat-selective180°. The result is that fat regrows very quickly after the 2nd fat-selective180° and fat-suppression is not achievable for a sequentially ordered acquisition: fat crosses the null point too early, requiring a very short fat TI (the time between the fat suppression pulse and the acquisition of the center of k-space, defined in Figure 1). However, the minimum fat TI is ~Tacq/2 for a sequential acquisition order. The "fat-restore" method uses an additional fat-selective 180° before the standard non-selective 180° used for LGE. The purpose of the "fat restore" pulse is to tip down the fat so that subsequent 180° tips it back up to full magnetization. This will permit the later fat-selective 180° to be effective (see schematic in Figure 1). Phantoms including fat were imaged with and without the fat-restore pulse. Finally, the method was used in patient LGE studies. Scan parameters for phantoms and human studies were: 60 bpm, TR/TR/flip = 4.3–5 ms/1.6–2.3 ms/20°, 32–40 views per segment (Tacq ~180 ms), sequential order, 1 RR per inversion, TI set to null myocardium at the center of k-space (250 ms for phantoms). The fat TI was set to 100 ms using the fat-restore pulse. Without the fat-restore pulse, the minimum achievable fat TI (~100 ms also) was used. For patients, 0.2 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA was injected, and scanning was performed 15–2 minutes post injection. All spectrally selective 180° pulses were adiabatic pulses. The spatial resolution was 2 × 2 × 8 mm for 2D LGE.
In phantom studies, the optimal fat TI (Figure 1) was ~120 ms and the ratio of SNRfat w/fatsat to SNRfat w/out fatsat was 8%, using the fat restore pulse; without the additional pulse the ratio was ~100%. Figure 2 shows that the fat restore pulse with a sequential acquisition order provided similar fat-suppression as the standard fat-saturation using centric order with reduced edge enhancement. Furthermore, without a fat-restore pulse, fat-suppression was not good. Figure 3 compares a fat-suppressed 2D LGE scan with centric order and sequential order, with and without the fat restore pulse, in a patient with mitral valve prolapse. The subcutaneous fat is well suppressed even for the sequential order (thick arrows) using the fat restore pulse. A region of confirmed enhancement can be seen in all images (thin arrows), but a edge-enhancement effect is seen only in the image with centric acquisition order (arrow-heads).
Discussion and conclusion
We have demonstrated that the fat-restore pulse improves fat-suppression for sequentially acquired LGE scans. Studies with 3D LGE will likely improve with the linear acquisition order, improving the confidence for detecting small regions of scar.