Why do we see myocardial edema in acute myocardial infarcts with balanced SSFP imaging?
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance volume 12, Article number: M12 (2010)
Recent studies have demonstrated that conventional balanced steady-state free precession (b-SSFP) cine imaging can identify regions of myocardial edema in-and-around acute myocardial infarctions (AMI). However, the underlying mechanisms of b-SSFP edema contrast are not well understood. A more detailed understanding of the contrast mechanisms at play may enable opportunities for optimization of SSFP-based edema contrast.
To investigate the mechanisms contributing to the b-SSFP-based edema contrast surrounding AMI in conventional cine b-SSFP images
Dogs (n = 3) subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury (LAD occlusion for 3 hours followed by reperfusion) were studied at baseline (pre-injury), 2-hours post-reperfusion (day 0), and on days 2, 5, and 7. Multiple breath-held short-axis cine b-SSFP images, and T2- and T1-maps were acquired at late diastole using a Siemens Espree (1.5 T) system. All studies were terminated with PSIR late-gadolinium-enhancement (LGE) acquisitions to confirm LAD infarction. Cine SSFP imaging was performed with TR/TE = 3.5/1.75 ms; flip angle = 70°; 20-25 phases. The cardiac phase corresponding to the T1 and T2 maps were identified from the cine b-SSFP images. On these SSFP images, and the relaxation maps, a semi-automated approach was used to identify the edematous territory. Using the Freeman-Hill equation for b-SSFP and the measured signal, T1 and T2 values for edematous and healthy territories, the relative contributions from relaxation and thermal magnetization (M0) effects were estimated.
Semi-automated and visual analysis did not identify regions of hyperenhancement in T1 and T2 maps, or SSFP or LGE images acquired under baseline conditions in any of the animals. Hyperintense LAD territories were readily identified on T1, T2, and cine SSFP images on days 0, 2, 5, and 7 in all dogs and the presence of AMI within the same territories was confirmed by LGE images (Figure 1). Mean relative contributions from relaxation and M0 effects, assessed over each imaging slice (across all studies), are shown in Figure 2. For all studies, signal contrast between edematous and healthy territories was 56.4 ± 14.7%. From the measured T1 and T2 maps, the theoretically expected edema contrast due to relaxation changes was 18.7 ± 9.5%.
Relaxation effects alone cannot explain the observed myocardial edema contrast in b-SSFP images. Results show that M0 effects, likely from proton density and/or magnetization transfer changes between healthy and edematous territories, have a substantial contribution to the b-SSFP image contrast. Optimization strategies that wish to maximize myocardial edema contrast in b-SSFP imaging should take relaxation and M0 effects into account.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, X., Rundell, V., Liu, Y. et al. Why do we see myocardial edema in acute myocardial infarcts with balanced SSFP imaging?. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12 (Suppl 1), M12 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-S1-M12