- Oral presentation
- Open Access
Cardiac imaging at 7.0 T: comparison of pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram triggered 2D-CINE for LV-function assessment
© Frauenrath et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Published: 21 January 2010
- Pulse Oximetry
- Cardiac Motion
- Signal Processing Unit
- Cardiac Motion Artifact
- Temporal Jittering
One important development which is looming on the (pre)clinical research horizon is the move towards CMR at 7.0 T . At (ultra)highfields, the sensitivity of ECG recordings to interference from electromagnetic fields and to magneto-hydrodynamic effects increases and with it the ECG failure rate together with the motivation for a robust, practical gating/triggering alternative. Realizing the constraints of conventional ECG, an MR-stethoscope has been proposed to meet the demands of cardiac triggered MRI .
Motivated by the challenges and limitations of conventional ECG together with the advantages of acoustic cardiac triggering (ACT), this study compares phonocardiogram, electrocardiogram and pulse oximetry triggered MRI for LV-function assessment at 7.0 T. For this purpose, breath-held 2D-CINE imaging in conjunction with a retrospective triggering regime was conducted.
The acoustic gating device comprises three main components: an acoustic sensor, an acoustic wave guide and a signal processing unit . Short axis views of the heart were acquired with a 2D-CINE-FLASH technique (TE = 2 ms, TR = 4 ms, matrix = 256 × 192, FOV = 36 cm2, 25 cardiac phases, slice thickness) on a 7.0 T MR-system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a dedicated 4-element TX/RX cardiac coil array. Vector-ECG, pulse oximetry and ACT traces were recorded simultaneously.
This work examined the feasibility of LV-function assessment at 7.0 T using acoustically triggered 2D-CINE imaging. ACT's superior robustness has been demonstrated by eliminating the frequently-encountered difficulty of mis-triggering due to ECG-waveform distortions or temporal jittering in the pulse-oximetry synchronization.
- Vaughan JT, Snyder CJ, DelaBarre LJ, Bolan PJ, Tian J, Bolinger L, Adriany G, Andersen P, Strupp J, Ugurbil K: Whole-body imaging at 7 T: preliminary results. Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2009, 61: 244-248.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frauenrath T, Hezel F, Heinrichs U, Kozerke S, Utting JF, Kob M, Butenweg C, Boesiger P, Niendorf T: Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope. Investigative radiology. 2009, 44: 539-547. 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c15e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frauenrath T, Niendorf T, Kob M: Acoustic method for synchronization of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Acta Acustica united with Acustica. 2008, 148-155. 10.3813/AAA.918017.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.