Volume 12 Supplement 1

Abstracts of the 13thAnnual SCMR Scientific Sessions - 2010

Open Access

Feasibility and validation of estimating Global LV functional indices from limited projections using a Modified Simpson's Algorithm

  • Ramkumar Krishnamurthy1,
  • Amol Pednekar2,
  • Benjamin Cheong3 and
  • Raja Muthupillai3
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201012(Suppl 1):O46

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-S1-O46

Published: 21 January 2010

Introduction

A stack of 10-12 cine SSFP slices covering the LV are typically acquired to estimate global LV function. But, in instances such as dobutamine stress MR, it is difficult to acquire 10-12 contiguous short axis slices, and acquisition is limited to cine imaging at three short-axis (located at basal, mid and apical portions of the LV), and three long axis orientations (2-, 3- and 4-chamber views) [1]. It is unclear if it is feasible obtain an estimate of global LV function, e.g., EDV, ESV, etc. from these limited views.

Purpose

The purpose of this work is to test the feasibility of developing a modified Simpson's algorithm that can calculate LV volumes from a limited sub-set of cardiac cine MR images (three short-axis views, and one long axis view), and validate the algorithm in human subjects.

Methods

Data acquisition: In 20 subjects (14 M, age: 38+9 years) a set of contiguous cardiac cine SSFP images in the short-axis and in the three standard long-axis orientations were acquired at 1.5 T. The acquisition parameters were: TR(ms)/TE(ms)/flip: 3.2/1.6/60°; acquired voxel-size: 2.5 × 2.5 × 8 mm3; temporal resolution: 40-60 ms; breath-hold time: 5-8 s/slice.

Modified Simpson's algorithm

The LV cavity geometric model is described in Figure 1. The total volume (V) of the left ventricle was calculated from the area (volume) of the LV cavity in the basal (Ab), mid (Am), and apical (Aa) slices by using the following formula in the figure 1a.
Figure 1

LV Cavity Geometric Model: The LV cavity between the mitral-valve annulus to basal slice was modeled as a cylinder of length L1, the two regions between the basal and mid, and mid and apical slices were moeled as tow cut-cones of lengths L2, and L3, and the apical region between the apical slice and the LV apex was modeled as a cone of length L4. L1 and L4 were calculated directly from one of the long axis views, and the L2, and L3 were calcualted from the inter-slice gap presribed during acquisition.

Data Analysis

The total LV volume was calculated using the modified Simpson's algorithm, and compared against the LV volume extracted from the expert drawn manual contours on the stack of contiguous short axis slices.

Results

Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the EDV, ESV, and EF estimated using the modified Simpson's algorithm was in close agreement with the values obtained from expert drawn contours on the stack of contiguous short axis slices. The percent mean bias and limits of agreement between the two methods for EDV, ESV, and EF were -7.3 ± 6.8%, 2.4 ± 15.3%, and -1.7 ± 6.1%, respectively, and this range is comparable to inter-and intra-observer variability reported in the literature [2] Table 1.
Table 1

Bland-Altman Analysis of LV function between Modified Simpson"s method and expert observer

Variable

Expert Observer

Modified Simpson Method

Bland-Altman

Percent Mean Bias ± SD (%)

EDV (ml)

155.6 ± 32.9

166.8 ± 35.1

-7.3 ± 6.8

ESV (ml)

65.0 ± 15.4

66.6 ± 15.3

2.4 ± 15.3

EF (%)

58.1 ± 5.2

59.7 ± 6.6

-1.7 ± 6.1

Conclusion

Total LV volume can be computed from three short-axis slices acquired at the basal, mid, and apical portions of the LV using the modified Simpson's algorithm as described. This approach can pave way for estimating metrics characterizing both regional and global LV function.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Rice University
(2)
Philips Health Care
(3)
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital

References

  1. JMRI. 2006, 24: 499-512. 10.1002/jmri.20678.Google Scholar
  2. JMRI. 2008, 28: 39-50. 10.1002/jmri.21363.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Krishnamurthy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement