Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Oral presentation
  • Open Access

Usefulness of left ventricular peak filling rate measurement by cardiac MR imaging in heart transplant recipients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201012 (Suppl 1) :O98

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-S1-O98

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Coronary Flow Reserve
  • Left Ventricular Diastolic Function
  • Heart Transplant Recipient
  • Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy
  • Peak Filling Rate

Introduction

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), a major late complication for heart transplant recipients, is characterized as a diffuse intimal hyperplasia of the coronary artery. Invasive coronary angiography and coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurement are often performed, but have some limitations for CAV screening of asymptomatic recipients. This vasculopathy usually accelerates left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction before systolic dysfunction. It has not been fully investigated which is more useful for detecting CAV, cardiac MR measurement of peak filling rate (PFR) as an index of LV diastolic function or invasive CFR measurement.

Purpose

We investigated the feasibility of noninvasive PFR measurement by MR for detecting CAV over invasive CFR measurement in recipients.

Methods

Between June 2006 and June 2009, 52 asymptomatic recipients (35 men, 17 women, aged 35.1 ± 15.4 years) underwent both cardiac MR and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) 8.4 ± 4.5 years after heart transplantation. We measured LV PFR normalized to end-diastolic volume (EDV) and ejection fraction (EF) by steady-state free precession cine MR imaging. We measured coronary flow reserve as ratio of maximal hyperemic to baseline coronary flow velocity by Doppler guidewire in 47 (90%) of these 52 recipients. According to Stanford classification based on intimal wall morphology assessed by IVUS, we classified recipients of grade 0-2 as negative and grade 3-4 as positive for CAV and compared the PFR, EF, and CFR values between the 2 groups using unpaired t-test. We calculated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in the relationship between PFR value and CAV and determined PFR cut-off value. Likewise, we classified recipients of low and high PFR based on the cut-off value and compared the EF and CFR values. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We classified 24 patients (46%) positive and 28 (54%) negative for CAV. Although there was no significant difference in the EF and CFR values, the PFR value was significantly lower in the positive than negative group (Table 1). Area under the ROC curve was 0.750. When PFR cut-off value was 3.50, CAV sensitivity was 51.6% and specificity, 83.5%. Using this cut-off value, EF and CFR values were significantly lower in the low than high PFR group (Table 2).

Table 1

 

CAV negative

CAV positive

P value

CFR

3.34 ± 0.87

3.06 ± 1.17

0.340

EF (%)

59.8 ± 7.8

57.7 ± 8.5

0.359

PFR (EDV/sec)

4.44 ± 0.87

3.68 ± 0.89

0.003

Table 2

 

High PFR

Low PFR

P value

CFR

3.46 ± 0.97

2.73 ± 0.95

0.017

EF (%)

60.9 ± 7.5

54.3 ± 7.7

0.004

Conclusion

The impairment of LV diastolic function may precede coronary microvasular and LV systolic dysfunction. For asymptomatic heart transplant recipients, PFR measurement with cardiac MR allows the most sensitive detection of CAV noninvasively.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan

Copyright

© Machida et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement