Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Impact of left ventricular volume and mass indexation method on the influence of obesity in a free-living population

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 3 and
  • 1
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201012(Suppl 1):P166

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-S1-P166

Published: 21 January 2010

Keywords

  • Body Mass Index
  • Body Surface Area
  • Left Ventricular Volume
  • Body Mass Index Category
  • Great Body Mass Index

Introduction

Increased left ventricular (LV) volume and mass are risk factors for increased cardiovascular disease. To account for differences in body size, LV parameters are generally indexed to height (HT) or body surface area (BSA). Increased body mass index (BMI), a measure of obesity, seems associated with increased LV volume and mass, but obesity is also associated with hypertension, potentially confounding relationships between BMI and LV volume and mass.

Purpose

We sought to determine the impact of indexation method on relationship between LV volume and mass and adiposity, i.e., overweight (OW, BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2), obese (OB, BMI ≥30) versus normal weight (NL, BMI 18.5-24.9) in a never-hypertensive population.

Methods

A subsample of 1794 members of the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort underwent CMR. Breath hold cine SSFP (TR3.0/TE1.5/FA 60°/1.56 × 1.92-mm2/THK 10-mm/0 gap) was used to encompass the LV in the short-axis orientation. LV contours were traced at end-diastole and end-systole to determine LV volumes (EDV, ESV) and mass. Offspring members have undergone comprehensive physical examinations every 3-4 years since 1971. Only Offspring free of hypertension (SBP≤140, DBP≤90 mmHg) on all examinations who never took antihypertensive medications were included in analysis. LV volumes and mass were indexed to HT and BSA. Sex-specific comparison of raw and indexed LV volumes and mass among NL, OW and OB groups used generalized linear models with multivariate correction for clinical covariates (blood pressure, cholesterol, age, fasting glucose).

Results

Of the 1794 Offspring scanned, 820 (50.2%) were never hypertensive. Men (n = 319) had significantly greater LV EDV, ESV and mass than women (n = 501) in each BMI category regardless of method of indexation (p < 0.01 all comparisons). The Table shows that in women EDV, ESV and mass, raw and indexed to HT, increased with greater BMI category (p for trend < 0.02 for all). In men mass (p = 0.001) and mass/HT (p < 0.0001) increased with BMI, but EDV and ESV did not (p > 0.29 all). Indexation to BSA showed decreased EDV and ESV with greater BMI category in both sexes. In men there was no difference in mass/BSA, while this decreased minimally but significantly in women (p = 0.002), Table 1.
Table 1

Left ventricular volume and mass versus BMI category

 

Men: NL

Men: OW

Men: OB

Men: p for trend

Women: NL

Women: OW

Women: OB

Women: p for trend

EDV, ml

144.0 ± 28.9

145.9 ± 25.5

145.9 ± 25.3

0.75

104.7 ± 16.5

107.6 ± 19.1

118.5 ± 22.2

<0.0001

ESV, ml

52.1 ± 15.0

51.3 ± 14.7

49.1 ± 13.1

0.29

34.0 ± 8.7

35.2 ± 10.8

37.8 ± 12.1

0.014

Mass, g

116.6 ± 21.0

124.7 ± 21.1

131.7 ± 21.9

0.0011

77.9 ± 12.5

82.4 ± 13.7

93.3 ± 16.7

<0.0001

EDV/HT, ml/m

80.8 ± 15.1

82.6 ± 19.8

83.2 ± 13.8

0.34

64.1 ± 9.2

66.6 ± 10.6

72.9 ± 12.2

<0.0001

ESV/HT, ml/m

29.2 ± 8.0

29.1 ± 8.1

28.0 ± 7.3

0.49

20.8 ± 4.9

21.8 ± 6.3

23.2 ± 7.1

0.0035

Mass/HT, g/m

65.4 ± 10.2

70.8 ± 11.4

75.1 ± 11.9

<0.0001

47.7 ± 6.5

51.1 ± 7.9

57.4 ± 9.4

0.0001

EDV/BSA, ml/m2

75.3 ± 13.5

71.5 ± 11.8

66.3 ± 10.4

0.078

63.6 ± 8.7

60.6 ± 9.2

59.1 ± 8.5

<0.0001

ESV/BSA, ml/m2

27.2 ± 7.2

25.1 ± 7.0

22.3 ± 5.5

0.0002

20.6 ± 4.9

19.8 ± 5.6

18.8 ± 5.4

0.0046

Mass/BSA, g/m2

60.9 ± 8.8

61.2 ± 9.8

59.8 ± 8.9

0.25

47.7 ± 6.5

46.5 ± 6.8

46.7 ± 7.0

0.0024

Conclusion

LV volumes and mass in women, and mass in men increases with greater BMI. Indexation to HT preserves these relationships, but indexation to BSA shows decreased LV volumes with greater BMI in both sexes. Whether HT, BSA or another quantity is the optimal method of indexation to account for adiposity remains to be determined.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
(2)
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, USA
(3)
the NHLBI's Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, USA

Copyright

© Chuang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement