Skip to content

Advertisement

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.

The effect of regurgitant volume on left ventricular volumes and dimensions in patients with isolated aortic or mitral regurgitation

  • Seth Uretsky1,
  • Surinder S Khokhar1,
  • Azhar Supariwala1,
  • Pushpalatha Nidadovolu1,
  • Cindy Comeau2,
  • Oleg Subayev2,
  • Francesca Campanile2 and
  • Steven D Wolff2
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201012(Suppl 1):P282

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-S1-P282

Published: 21 January 2010

Keywords

Mitral RegurgitationAortic RegurgitationLinear DimensionVentricular VolumeLeft Ventricular Volume

Introduction

The treatment of patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) or mitral regurgitation (MR) relies on the accurate assessment of the severity of the regurgitation and its effect on left ventricular (LV) size and function. CMR is an excellent tool for quantifying regurgitant volumes and LV size and function. The 2006 AHA/ACC management guidelines for the therapy of patients with AR or MR describe LV size in terms of linear dimensions (i.e. end-diastolic and end-systolic dimension). LV volumes that correspond to these linear dimensions have not been published in the peer-reviewed literature.

Purpose

To determine the effect of regurgitant volume on LV volumes and chamber dimensions in patients with isolated AR or MR and preserved LV function.

Methods

This study comprises 62 consecutive CMR exams in 57 patients with isolated AR or MR. LV volumes were determined from short and long-axis 1.5 T FIESTA images using a semiautomated algorithm (ReportCard 4.0). Flow in the proximal aorta and pulmonary artery was assessed with phase-contrast imaging. Baseline correction was performed using a stationary phantom. AR volume was determined by integrating aortic blood flow throughout diastole. MR volume was determined as the difference between LV stroke volume and pulmonary artery flow. To determine the reproducibility of AR and MR regurgitant volume, a second blinded analysis was made according to the same method.

Results

There is a strong, linear relationship between regurgitant volume and LV end-diastolic volume index (AR r2 = 0.8, MR r2 = 0.8) (figure). Bland Altman analysis of regurgitant volume shows little interobserver variation (AR: 0.6 + 4 ml; MR: 4 + 6 ml). The correlation is much poorer between regurgitant volume and commonly used clinical linear measures such as end-systolic dimension (MR r2 = 0.2, AR r2 = 0.5). Linear regression is used to determine the LV volumes that correspond to the linear dimensions currently recommended in the 2006 AHA/ACC management guidelines (Figure 1, Table 1).
Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 2

Conclusion

MRI is a robust technique for quantification of regurgitant volume in patients with AR or MR and preserved LV function. Ventricular volumes show a stronger correlation with regurgitant volume than linear dimensions, suggesting LV volumes better reflect ventricular remodeling in patients with isolated mitral or aortic regurgitation. For a given regurgitant volume, AR results in greater LV enlargement than patients with MR, likely due to the fact that MR is a pure volume lesion whereas AR is both a pressure and a volume lesion. Ventricular volumes that correspond to published recommended linear dimensions are determined to guide the timing of surgical intervention.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
St. Luke's and Roosevelt Hospitals, New York, USA
(2)
Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, New York, USA

Copyright

© Uretsky et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement