- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Comparison of systolic and diastolic 3D SSFP for arterial dimensions and coronary artery origins in patients with congenital heart disease
© Garg et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Published: 1 February 2012
- Congenital Heart Disease
- Vessel Diameter
- Leave Pulmonary Artery
- Heart Disease Patient
- Congenital Heart Disease Patient
3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequences allow for acquisition of isotropic datasets without the need for IV placement and contrast administration. Similar to MR angiography, they can be post-processed using multiplanar reconstruction, allowing for cross-sectional vessel measurements. They are also ECG-gated, allowing for visualization of coronary artery origins, which cannot be reliably evaluated by MRA. Arteries are preferentially measured in systole to obtain maximal diameter. However, because of motion blurring, this may be a suboptimal phase for diagnosis of coronary origins.
We hypothesized that systolic SSFP (sSSFP) would provide larger measurements of arterial vessel diameter than either diastolic SSFP (dSSFP) or MRA sequences, yet provide adequate image quality for diagnosis of coronary artery origins.
A retrospective review of 24 congenital heart disease patients with MRA, sSSFP and dSSFP datasets was performed. Cross-sectional measurements were performed in the mid-ascending aorta (AAo), right pulmonary artery (RPA) and left pulmonary artery (LPA). Diagnostic quality of SSFP datasets was determined for the LCA and RCA on a scale of 1-5.
For coronary evaluation, image quality was nondiagnostic (score <3) in 11/48 origins by sSSFP compared to 4/48 origins by dSSFP (Table 2). The mean LCA quality score was higher for dSSFP (4.1 vs 3.6,p=0.05); RCA scores were similar (3.9 vs 3.5,p=0.9).
Systolic 3D SSFP yields larger vessel diameters than dSSFP or MRA. These measurements may be more reflective of true maximal diameter. However, poorer image quality of sSSFP precluded vessel measurement and diagnosis of coronary artery origins in a larger number of subjects compared with dSSFP or MRA.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.