Skip to main content
Figure 1 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Figure 1

From: 3T versus 1.5T MR angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: an equivalence trial in comparison with digital subtraction angiography

Figure 1

Coronal contrast-enhanced MR angiographic maximum intensity projection images of 67-year-old man presenting with bilateral claudication: (A) 1.5T and (B) 3T contrast-enhanced MR angiography show significant stenosis in the left external iliac artery (short arrow) and an occlusion in the right superficial femoral artery (long arrow). There is an excellent correlation between MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography (C).

Back to article page