Skip to main content

Advertisement

Importance of k-space trajectory on Off resonance artifact in echo-planar velocity imaging

Summary

Top-down and center-out echo planar imaging (EPI) trajectories were thoroughly studied in theory, phantom scans, and volunteer scans to establish a clear understanding of the manifestation of off-resonance artifacts.

Background

EPI is a highly efficient data acquisition technique, but is sensitive to off-resonance. In cardiac and flow imaging, field inhomogeneity is typically 70Hz in the myocardium and 100+ Hz in the blood pool at 1.5T(1). Choice of k-space trajectories is important; the center-out trajectory is often recommended over top-down to minimize TE and thereby maximize signal and minimize flow and motion error accumulation. Previous work has noted higher artifact with the center-out trajectory (2) although a comprehensive and systematic description is lacking.

Methods

Theoretical point spread function (PSF) calculations and computer simulations were performed to compare the center-out and top-down EPI trajectories. A gradient echo planar sequence (GRE-EPI) was developed with through plane two-sided (symmetric) velocity encoding and an echo time of 2.2ms (center-out) and 6.3ms (top-down). Shared velocity encoding (SVE) was used to reconstruct flow images (3). A constant flow phantom was imaged matching clinical image parameters. Demonstrative scans at the aortic valve in a single volunteer were preformed. In both phantom and volunteer scans, a frequency offset applied to investigate off-resonance effects.

Results

PSF analysis and computer simulations revealed that off-resonance causes a simple positional shift with top-down trajectory while the center-out trajectory leads to a more severe and complex artifact comprised of a positional shift, splitting, and blurring (see Figure). The distance of the shift artifact is twice as great with the center-out trajectory compared to top-down.

Figure 1
figure1

Magnitude and phase images for both trajectories for various off resonances. Phase images are magnitude threshold masked. Shift, splitting, and blurring artifacts were easily seen with the center-out trajectory and were not appreciable for the top-down trajectory in all experiments.

The top-down trajectory does not modulate the phase of the signal whereas the center-out trajectory does. This in combination with the phase effects from velocity encoding leads to complex artifacts affecting both the magnitude and phase image.

For the center-out trajectory, artifact phase modulation and velocity encoding leads to differences in magnitude images from the positive and negative velocity encoded k-spaces. This can cause a severe flickering the in the magnitude cines in the presence of flow and off-resonance.

The center-out trajectory provided a 15.6% higher signal than the top-down trajectory attributable to the shorter TE.

Flow quantification is overestimated and peak velocity suprizingly well maintained (Table 1).

Table 1 Peak velocity and flow quantification.

Conclusions

A center-out EPI trajectory produces a more complex, severe, and variable artifact than a top-down trajectory with only a moderate improvement in the signal level.

References

  1. 1.

    Reeder : MRM. 1998, 39: 988-998.

  2. 2.

    Luk-Pat : MRM. 1997, 37: 3,436-447.

  3. 3.

    Lin , Hung-Yu : Shared Velocity Encoding (SVE): A method to improve the temporal resolution of phase contrast velocity measurements. MRM.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Jacob A Bender.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bender, J.A., Simonetti, O.P. Importance of k-space trajectory on Off resonance artifact in echo-planar velocity imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14, W68 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-S1-W68

Download citation

Keywords

  • Point Spread Function
  • Echo Planar Imaging
  • Resonance Artifact
  • Velocity Encode
  • Shift Artifact