Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Association between left atrial function using multimodality tissue tracking from cine MRI and myocardial scar in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA)

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 4 and
  • 1
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201315 (Suppl 1) :P266

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-S1-P266

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Late Gadolinium Enhancement
  • Left Atrial
  • Longitudinal Strain
  • Myocardial Scar
  • Left Atrial Function

Background

Left atrial (LA) function is strongly related to left ventricular (LV) filling pressures and has shown association to cardiovascular outcomes. A recently developed speckle tracking technique can assess LA deformation using CMR cine sequences. Myocardial scar assessed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE-CMR) relates to cardiac remodeling, but its association to LA function is unknown. We explored the relationship of LA function with the amount of myocardial scar.

Methods

A total of 1666 participants from the MESA, age range 55-94 yrs, underwent LGE-CMR using 1.5T scanners at six field centers. Myocardial scar was visually detected, classified (ischemic/non-ischemic), and quantified using semi-automated methods in 136 participants. The amount of scar was quantified as the ratio of scar mass over total LV mass and values greater than 5% were defined as clinically significant. LA function was evaluated using multimodality tissue tracking (MTT) from SSFP 2- and 4-chamber long-axis cine CMR images in all participants with myocardial scar and in an age and gender matched control group of 136 participants without scar. LA function was assessed using peak longitudinal strain (Smax), diastolic longitudinal strain rate (SRdia), ejection fraction (LAEF), emptying fraction (LAEmF), and LA maximum volume (Vmax). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate differences between groups: control, scar>5%, and scar<5%. Pearson's correlation assessed the relationship between the amount of scar and LA function parameters.

Results

From the total of 136 participants with myocardial scar (72±9 yrs, 86% male, 48% ischemic), 43 participants had scars that were clinically significant (74±8 yrs, 86% male, 98% ischemic). No significant difference was found between the groups for Vmax and LAEF. LAEmF, Smax, and SRdia were the most robust parameters comparing the groups (Table 1). Both the strain parameters were significantly different between the control and the scar>5% groups while for LAEmF the difference was marginal (p=0.05). SRdia and LAEmF were significant when the scar>5% and scar<5% groups were compared, while Smax was marginally different (p=0.06). None of the parameters differed between the control and the scar<5% groups. The percent LV scar correlated significantly with LAEmF (r=-0.21, p=<0.02), Smax (r=-0.18, p<0.04), and SRdia (r=0.18, p=0.04) but not with Vmax (p=0.08) and LAEF (p=0.20).
Table 1

Comparison among control group, scar<5% group, and scar>5% group with peak volume, LA ejection fraction, LA emptying fraction, peak strain, and peak diastolic strain rate. * p<0.05 for comparison between scar<5% and scar>5% groups. ^ p<0.05 for comparison between control and scar>5% groups

 

Median (25th percentile ,75th percentile)

 

Control (n=136)

Scar<5% (n=93)

Scar>5% (n=43)

Peak Volume ml

75.55 (62.85, 88.11)

73.97 (63.10, 85.74)

79.37 (62.60, 102.91)

LA Ejection Fraction %

37 (29, 42)

37 (29, 42)

35 (28, 40)

LA Emptying Fraction %

48 (40, 53)

50 (42, 53)

44* (39, 50)

Peak Strain %

23.78 (19.32, 30.33)

25.31 (20.63, 31.99)

21.46^ (18.65, 26.32)

Peak Diastolic Strain Rate %/ms

-0.70 (-1.00, -0.45)

-0.80 (-1.04, -0.49)

-0.59*^ (-0.83, -0.44)

Conclusions

LA parameters are associated with cardiac remodeling in clinically significant myocardial scar. LAEmF, Smax and SRdia are more sensitive to changes in cardiac function resulting from the presence of myocardial scar than traditional LA functional parameters Vmax and LAEF.

Funding

NHLBI N01-HC-95159

NHLBI N01-HC-95168

NCRR UL1-RR-024156

NCRR UL1-RR-025005

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
(2)
Union memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
(3)
Washington University, Washington, DC, DC, USA
(4)
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

Copyright

© Imai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement