Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Workshop presentation
  • Open Access

Reduced chemical shift-induced phase errors at 3T using novel PC-MRI encoding gradients

  • 1, 2 and
  • 1, 2
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201315 (Suppl 1) :W35

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-S1-W35

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Temporal Resolution
  • Velocity Encode
  • Gradient Moment
  • Vessel Pair
  • Slice Select Gradient

Background

Cardiovascular MRI benefits from improved SNR-efficiency at ≥3T [1,]2, but is subject to other sources of error, which require careful consideration when transitioning from primary use of 1.5T scanners. For example, chemical shift-induced PC-MRI errors [3] are increased at 3T compared to 1.5T. Chemical shift causes the complex perivascular fat signal to chemically shift into the vessel lumen and superposes with the complex blood (water) signal, thereby corrupting the phase (velocity) estimate. Chemical shift errors can be minimized by increasing the bandwidth (reduces the magnitude of the shifted fat signal), and by using an in-phase TE (TEIN, ensures fat and water are in-phase). Shorter TEs improve SNR, therefore it is advantageous that the minimum TEIN (TEIN,MIN) at 3T is 2.46ms, which is substantially shorter than TEIN,MIN=4.92ms at 1.5T, but such short TEs cannot be attained with conventional flow-compensated/flow-encoded (FCFE) velocity encoding strategies. The objective was to design a velocity encoding strategy void of conventional FCFE gradients that instead achieves through-plane velocity sensitivity using the slice select gradient, which yields a non-zero first gradient moment (M1) for the first PC-MRI TR: M1,1=X. The slice-select refocusing gradient (SSRG) lobe is time-shifted for the second TR to produce M1,2=X+Y, such that ΔM1=Y=π•γ-1•VENC-1. We hypothesize that the proposed SSRG velocity encoding scheme, will permit the use of TEIN,MIN for chemical shift insensitive PC-MRI measures at 3T that are both faster and have improved SNR.

Methods

PC-MRI measurements were acquired in volunteers (N=10) on a Siemens 3T scanner with SSRG: TE/TR=2.46/4.46ms (TEIN,MIN), 192×132 matrix, 1.6mm2×6mm resolution, 30° flip angle, 814Hz/pixel (high bandwidth, HBW), 4 views-per-segment, 35.7ms temporal resolution, and VENC=200cm/s. 2D through-plane velocity encoding was acquired in the ascending aorta (aAo), main pulmonary artery (PA), and right and left pulmonary arteries (RPA and LPA). For comparison FCFE PC-MRI was acquired with the following changes: TE/TR=3.08/6.04ms (TEMID), 401Hz/px (low bandwidth, LBW), and 48.3ms temporal resolution. Eddy current background phase errors were corrected [4]. Intra-subject flow agreement (flow difference between vessels) was compared for SSRG and FCFE for all vessel pairs (aAo vs. PA, aAo vs. RPA+LPA, and PA vs. RPA+LPA).

Results

Figure 1 and Table 1 show significantly improved intra-subject flow agreement for SSRG compared to FCFE. SSRG also provides a 26% increase in temporal resolution and a 33% increase in SNR (87.7±40.8 vs. 58.5±24.8, P=0.01) compared to FCFE.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Intra-subject flow agreement between the conventional flow compensated and flow encoded (FCFE) velocity encoding sequence at LBW+TEMID (red diamonds) and the slice select refocusing gradient (SSRG) sequence at HBW+TEIN,MIN without (blue squares) and with (green circles) eddy current correction. Data from individual subjects (N=10) are connected to show that SSRG with HBW+TEIN,MIN leads to better intra-vessel flow agreement for every subject compared to FCFE with LBW+TEMID. Correcting for eddy currents further improves the agreement. The box plot shows the median and 25th and 75th percentiles and the error bars show the 95% confidence intervals.

Table 1

Intra-subject percent flow difference from the pre-clinical evaluation of ten normal volunteers (N=10) expressed as a mean ± SD [minimum, maximum].

 

FCFE

LBW+TEMID

SSRG

HBW+TEIN,MIN

*P-Value

aAo vs. PA

5.8 ± 2.8%

[0.98, 8.9%]

1.7 ± 1.9%

[0.16, 2.8%]

0.002

aAo vs. RPA+LPA

6.0 ± 4.3%

[0.85, 9.8%]

2.1 ± 1.7%

[0.60, 2.5%]

0.03

PA vs. RPA+LPA

6.1 ± 6.3%

[0.11, 7.6%]

2.9 ± 2.1%

[0.57, 2.2%]

0.04

*P < 0.05 show a statistical significant difference between FCFE LBW+TEMID and SSRG HBW+TEIN,MIN indicating significant improvement in internal consistency flow measures using SSRG HBW+TEIN,MIN in PC-MRI.

Conclusions

Our 3T optimized SSRG PC-MRI sequence minimizes chemical shift-induced phase errors and improves intra-subject flow agreement compared to FCFE.

Funding

This work is supported in part by NIH/NHLBI K99-R00 HL-087614 and Siemens Medical Solutions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
(2)
Biomedical Physics Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

References

  1. Lotz et al: JMRI. 2005Google Scholar
  2. Strecker et al: JMRI. 2012Google Scholar
  3. Middione et al: MRM. 2012Google Scholar
  4. Chernobelsky et al: JCMR. 2007Google Scholar

Copyright

© Middione and Ennis; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement