- Oral presentation
- Open Access
Impact of beta-blocker therapy on thoracic aorta 3D wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance volume 16, Article number: O47 (2014)
Beta-blockers are the recommended medical treatment for slowing ascending aorta (AAo) dilation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Wall shear stress (WSS) has been shown to promote endothelial cell dysfunction  and AAo WSS may play a role in aortic aneurysm growth. Time-resolved 3D phase contrast (4D flow) MRI allows for the quantification of 3D WSS regionally in the thoracic aorta. The aim of this study was to assess changes in thoracic aorta WSS associated with β-blocker therapy in BAV patients.
BAV patients on β-blockers (BB+) (n = 10, M:F = 8:2, age: 53 ± 11 years) or not on β-blockers (BB-) (n = 10, M:F = 9:1, age: 51 ± 15 years) underwent 4D flow MRI as part of this IRB-approved study. Groups were matched by BAV morphology (all right-left fusion), systolic blood pressure (BB+: 137 ± 12 mmHg, BB -: 132 ± 17 mmHg, p = 0.48), degree of aortic stenosis, and AAo diameter (BB+: 4.1 ± 0.7 cm, BB-: 3.6 ± 0.4 cm, p = 0.07). Five patients in each group were concurrently treated with ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. Data analysis included correction for eddy currents and velocity aliasing and 3D segmentation of the thoracic aorta (MIMICS, Materlise, Belgium). Peak systolic WSS (WSSsys) was calculated within the vessel using the method described by van Ooij. The aorta was divided into ascending, arch, and descending regions, and max and mean WSSsys were calculated in each region. WSSsysmaximum intensity projections (MIP) were mapped onto a sagittal view of each aorta for visual comparison. Quantitative results were compared using Student's t-test. Spearman (rS) or Pearson (r) correlation was performed as appropriate.
No statistical difference in max or mean WSSsys was observed between BB+ and BB- groups at any region along the aorta, although values were consistently lower in the BB+ group (Table 1). Max WSSsys in the AAo showed no correlation with aortic diameter (r = .289, p = 0.22) but did correlate with the degree of aortic stenosis (rS = 0.44, p = 0.05). WSSsys MIPs for all subjects are shown in Figure 1. The magnitude and regional distribution of WSSsyswas highly variable between individuals for both groups. Decreased eccentricity of WSSsys in the AAo was observed in BB+ patients.
Our results suggest that the impact of β-blocker therapy on the degree of WSS in the thoracic aorta is limited, but treatment may alter AAo WSS distribution. The high inter-individual variability of 3D WSS highlights the potential diagnostic value of 4D flow MRI WSS quantification for individualized assessment β-blocker effectiveness in BAV aortopathy. A prospective study in a large number of patients pre- and post-treatment is required to better isolate the impact of β-blockers in this population.
NIH NCI 5R25CA132822-04, NIH NHLBI R01HL115828; AHA13SDG14360004, BAV Program at the Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute.
Reneman RS: J Vasc Res. 2006, 43 (3): 251-269. 10.1159/000091648.
van Ooij P: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013,
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, B.D., van Ooij, P., Barker, A.J. et al. Impact of beta-blocker therapy on thoracic aorta 3D wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16, O47 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-16-S1-O47
- Wall Shear Stress
- Aortic Stenosis
- Thoracic Aorta
- Bicuspid Aortic Valve
- Wall Shear Stress Distribution