- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Determinants of myocardial perfusion reserve measured from coronary sinus phase-contrast imaging during regadenoson stress CMR
© Bauml et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Published: 16 January 2014
- Coronary Sinus
- Myocardial Perfusion Reserve
- Coronary Sinus Flow
- Regadenoson Stress
Measurement of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) can potentially extend the scope of conventional myocardial perfusion imaging from detection of flow limiting epicardial stenosis to assessment of coronary microvascular function. Recent studies have suggested that MPR may improve risk stratification of patients with known or suspected CAD. MPR has traditionally been measured using PET or CMR time-intensity curves. However, these techniques are cumbersome, require radiation (for PET) and are not practical for routine clinical practice. Measurement of coronary sinus (CS) flow with phase-contrast MRI is an alternative, simple method for assessing MPR. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical determinants of MPR using this method in patients with symptoms of possible myocardial ischemia presenting for CMR stress testing.
117 consecutive patients referred for suspected myocardial ischemia underwent a CMR stress-rest perfusion protocol. Perfusion imaging was performed at 1-minute and 15-minutes after administration of 0.4 mg of regadenoson. CS through-plane flow was measured using a phase-contrast segmented gradient echo sequence at baseline (pre) and immediately after stress perfusion (peak). MPR was calculated as peak CS flow/pre CS flow. Clinical variables were stratified by impaired MPR (<2) vs preserved MPR (≥2). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to derive the clinical predictors of impaired MPR (<2).
MPR can be rapidly measured in the clinical setting using CS flow measurements during stress CMR. Patients with impaired MPR were significantly more likely to have advanced age, diabetes, higher Framingham risk score, and history of current smoking. On multivariate analysis, current smoking was the only independent predictor of reduced MPR. Whether this method of MPR assessment can provide independent, additive prognostic value requires further investigation.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.