Skip to content


  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Reduced myocardial perfusion in post renal transplant population is not associated with aortic stiffness

  • 4, 1,
  • 1, 3,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 1, 4,
  • 2, 4 and
  • 1, 4
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201416 (Suppl 1) :P226

  • Published:


  • Myocardial Perfusion
  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Pulse Wave Velocity
  • Renal Transplant Patient
  • Aortic Stiffness


Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess central (aortic) vascular dysfunction in post renal transplant patients by high-resolution cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Background: Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. The cardiac phenotype in post-transplant recipients is not well defined. A recent study suggested myocardial perfusion is impaired in renal transplant patients irrespective of the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy[1].We hypothesized that post transplant patients have persistently increased aortic stiffness, and that it could be correlated with reduced myocardial perfusion.


Methods: Twenty-five asymptomatic renal transplant patients (RT) and 17 hypertensive controls (HT) underwent CMR scanning at 1.5 T. Myocardial function, late enhancement, aortic pulse wave velocity and first-pass perfusion at rest and stress was performed. Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Index (MPRI) was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to resting myocardial blood flow by dividing the myocardial perfusion at stress by rest perfusion (corrected to rate pressure product). Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was calculated as the ratio between the distance and time from ascending aorta to descending aorta at the level of main pulmonary artery. Statistical analyses were performed using mixed effects modelling for MPRI and linear regression for relationship between MPRI and PWV.


Results: Baseline clinical characteristics were similar for RT and HT control groups. Mean inter-ventricular septal thickness and LV mass indexed to body surface area were similar in both RT cases and HT controls. MPRI was significantly lower in the RT group compared to the HT group (1.36 ± 0.52 vs 2.06 ± 0.59, p = 0.0004), globally and in all three coronary artery territories[1]. Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) is not significantly different between RT and HT group (3.46 ± 0.51 vs 5.21 ± 1.07, p = 0.14). There is no correlation between aortic pulse wave velocity and MPRI (r2 = 0.0026, coeff = 0.18, p = 0.83).


Conclusions: In our cohort population, there is no evidence of increased aortic stiffness in post renal transplant patients compared to hypertensive patients. Although these patients demonstrate impaired myocardial perfusion reserve, this is not correlated with increased aortic stiffness.



Authors’ Affiliations

Cardiology, Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
Renal Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
Flinders Centre for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Research, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
School of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia


  1. Parnham S, Grover S, Bradbrook C, Srinivasan G, DePasquale C, Woodman R, Gleadle J, Selvanayagam J: Myocardial Perfusion is Impaired in Asymptomatic Patients Post Renal Transplantation. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2013, 15 (Supple 1): E68-PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Parnham et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.