- Poster presentation
- Open Access
RV work efficiency is greatly reduced in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension as evidenced by 4D flow cardiac MRI
© Han et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Published: 16 January 2014
- Right Ventricular
- Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
- Wall Shear Stress
- Pulmonic Valve
- Right Ventricular Function
The dynamic assessment of intracardiac flow remained challenging until the recent development of time-resolved 3D phase-contrast CMR (PC-CMR), which allows for assessment of multi-dimensional whole heart and great vessel flow. Previous studies have used this technique in the ventricles to quantify flow type of the ventricle and the kinetic energy of each flow component. In the great vessels, parameters such as total flow, peak systolic velocity, and wall shear stress have excellent scan-rescan, inter-observer, and intra-observer reproducibility. In disease conditions, pathological vortices have been reported both in the ventricles and great vessels. We propose to use time-resolved 3D PC-CMR to study right ventricular (RV) work in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as compared to normal subjects.
Five healthy subjects and eight patients with PAH underwent cardiac MRI exams, in which 2D cine short axis slices, 2D and 4D flow were acquired. The 4D flow data were acquired during free breathing using an ECG-gated 3D cine PC-MRI sequence on a 1.5T Siemens Avanto scanner (Germany) with the following parameters: Venc = 125 cm/s, flip angle = 8°, voxel size = 2.50 × 2.50 × 2.50 mm3, and bandwidth = 400 Hz, slab thickness about 60-70 mm covering the complete RV and at least the main PA. Acquisition time is 17 to 25 minutes. Following the flow acquisition, the flow data were reconstructed into 13-21 time frames. Total kinetic energy through tricuspid and pulmonic valves were calculated with diastolic and systolic durations respectively. RV workload and RV efficiency were defined and calculated as the following: RV workload=(KEout−KEin)/KEout , and RV efficiency = 1-RV workload, where KEin and KEout correspond to the kinetic energy coming in and out of the two RV valves.
In conclusion, this study has quantified the kinetic energy input and output through the RV over the cardiac cycle, and estimated the lower bound of work done by the RV as the difference between the kinetic energy coming in from the tricuspid valve and out of the pulmonic valve. RV efficiency, independent from other existing RV parameters, appears to provide a potential new metric to assess RV function. This initial approach opens the door to more precise quantifications.
This research was funded through FOCUS Junior Faculty Investigator Award for Research in Women's Cardiovascular Health supported by the Edna G. Kynett Memorial Foundation.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.